Flood v. Country Mut. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 24 September 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 41187,41187 |
| Citation | 242 N.E.2d 149,41 Ill.2d 91 |
| Parties | Bernard FLOOD, Admr., Appellee, v. COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Whitney D. Hardy, Mattoon (Jack E. Horsley, Mattoon, of counsel) for appellant.
Glenn & Logue, Mattoon, for appellee.
This appeal presents questions concerning the scope of an arbitration agreement contained in a standard automobile insurance policy. The policy in question provided:
'To pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured Vehicle because of bodily injury, including death resulting therefrom, hereinafter called 'bodily injury' sustained by the Insured, caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such Uninsured Vehicle; provided, for the purposes of this coverage, determination as to whether the Insured or such representative is legally entitled to recover such damages, and if so the amount thereof shall be made by agreement between the Insured or such representative and the Company or, if they fail to agree and the Insured or the Company so demands, by arbitration.'
In the same section, it defined the terms 'Insured' and 'Uninsured Vehicle' and further provided under a subsection entitled 'Arbitration' that:
'If any person making claim hereunder and the Company do not agree that such person is legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of an Uninsured Vehicle because of bodily injury to the Insured, or do not agree as to the amount of payment which may be owing under this Section, then, upon written demand of such person or upon written demand of the Company, the matter or matters upon which such person and the Company do not agree shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association * * *.'
Pursuant to the provisions of this policy, plaintiff-insured, Bernard Flood, sought damages from the defendant-insurer for the death of his son, arising out of a collision with an alleged uninsured vehicle. The defendant disputed coverage, denying that the decedent was an insured under the policy or that he had collided with an uninsured vehicle, and plaintiff made demand for arbitration. The arbitrator ruled these issues were subject to arbitration, whereupon defendant filed its refusal to arbitrate and petitioned the circuit court of Coles County, pursuant to section 2(b) of the Illinois Uniform Arbitration Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 10, par. 102(b)) to stay the arbitration proceedings pending the court's determination of the issue of coverage. The court denied the motion and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. Defendant filed an interlocutory appeal and the Appellate Court, Fourth District, affirmed, holding that the 'coverage' issues were made arbitrable by the contract of insurance. (89 Ill.App.2d 358, 232 N.E.2d 32.) We granted leave to appeal.
The Illinois Uniform Arbitration Act () was enacted in 1961 and is substantially the Uniform Act promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1955. The chief effect and benefit of this Act is that it grants legal enforceability to arbitration agreements to settle future, as...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Benson
... ... Cf. Korshalla v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 154 N.J.Super. 235, 239, 381 A.2d 88 (Law Div.1977) (issue whether passenger met ... of coverage is exclusively a judicial question and may not be decided by arbitration"); Flood v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 41 Ill.2d ... 91, 93, 242 N.E.2d 149, 151 (1968) (question whether ... ...
-
Board of Ed. of Berkeley County v. W. Harley Miller, Inc.
...hold that the court cannot go beyond the explicit terms of the contract to find an agreement to arbitrate, Flood v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 41 Ill.2d 91, 242 N.E.2d 149, (1968); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Cook, 21 Ariz.App. 313, 519 P.2d 66 (1974), the trend among the jurisdictions is to hold that......
-
Johnson v. Orkin, LLC
...upon application of a party, to compel or stay arbitration, or to stay court action pending arbitration.” Flood v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 41 Ill.2d 91, 242 N.E.2d 149, 151 (1968). The IUAA provides, in relevant part, that “[a] written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitrat......
-
J & K Cement Const., Inc. v. Montalbano Builders, Inc.
...are interpreted in the same manner and according to the same rules as are all other contracts. (See Flood v. Country Mutual Insurance Co. (1968), 41 Ill.2d 91, 242 N.E.2d 149.) The parties are bound to submit only those issues which they have agreed clearly to resolve through the arbitratio......
-
Arbitration in Colorado: the Uniform Arbitration Act of 1975
...developed in labor arbitration. Ramonas v. Kereb's, 102 Ill. App.2d 262, 243 N.E.2d 711 (1968). 35. Flood v. Country Mat. Ins. Co., 41 Ill.2d 91, 242 N.E.2d 149 (1968). 36. Wiley v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543, 55 LRRM 2769 (1964); Operating Engineers Local 150 v. Hair Builders, 406 U.S. 487, ......