Florida Appellate Rules., In re, 37079
Decision Date | 19 June 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 37079,37079 |
Citation | 211 So.2d 198 |
Parties | In re FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
William P. Simmons, Jr., as President, and Henry P. Trawick, Jr., as Chairman, Florida Court Rules Committee.
The Florida Appellate Rules, 1962 Revision, as amended, are hereby amended in the following respects, viz:
Rule 1.3 is amended by adding thereto the following:
" 'Civil action' includes all proceedings before courts which, from the subject matter, or the relief sought, are such as formerly were cognizable at law or in equity, and includes all proceedings before commissions or boards acting in a judicial or quasi judicial capacity."
Rule 2.1g is amended to read as follows:
Rule 3.2b is amended to read as follows:
Rule 3.2f is amended to read as follows:
"Rule 3.2f. Costs, prepayment of.--The mere nonpayment of costs, accruing before the appeal is taken and taxed against the appellant shall not affect his right to an appeal."
Rule 3.11b is hereby amended by striking all of said rule and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Rule 3.11e (1) is amended to read as follows:
Rule 4.2a is amended to read as follows:
Rule 4.2b is amended to read as follows:
Rule 4.3. The first paragraph of Rule 4.3 is amended to read as follows:
"Appeals may be taken in bond validation proceedings only from the final judgment within 30 days after the rendition of such judgment."
Rule 4.5c (1) is amended to read as follows:
The second paragraph of Rule 4.5c (6) is amended to read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Page, 78-2063
...provides thirty days from the "rendition of the final decision, order, or judgment" in which to prosecute an appeal. In re Florida Appellate Rules, 211 So.2d 198 (Fla.1968). Although the reviewing court has no jurisdiction to hear a case after the time for appeal has expired, Ramagli Realty......
-
State v. Pearce, AA--435
...by search and seizure (§ 924.071, F.S.). . .."3 In re Florida Rules of Crim. Proc., 245 So.2d 33, 36 (Fla.1971).4 In re Florida Appellate Rules, 211 So.2d 198, 300 (Fla.1968).5 E.g., '(T)he last expression of the Legislature will prevail in cases of conflicting statutes. . . .' Albury v. Ci......
-
Bowl America Florida, Inc. v. Schmidt, 79-439
...include among the appealable interlocutory orders "orders granting or denying dismissal for lack of prosecution." In Re Florida Appellate Rules, 211 So.2d 198, 199, (Fla.1968). Rule 9.130 of the new Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure states that interlocutory appeals shall be limited to t......
-
Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc.
...of appeal or the circuit courts in reviewing any appropriate interlocutory order by common law certiorari. As amended effective Oct. 1, 1968 (211 So.2d 198); Sept. 30, 1970 (237 So.2d 138).' (Emphasis C. Rule 4.2, F.A.R., supra, specifically disallows and disqualifies interlocutory appeals ......
-
The proposal to repeal Rule 9.130(a) (3) (C) (iv).
...1977, rule 4.2 authorized nonfinal review of "orders granting or denying motions to vacate defaults." See In re Florida Appellate Rules, 211 So. 2d 198, 199 (Fla. 1968). When rule 9.130 was promulgated, it did not specifically address defaults. However, the Supreme Court held that an order ......