Florida Frozen Foods, Inc. v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
| Citation | 439 N.Y.S.2d 771,81 A.D.2d 978 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Decision Date | 28 May 1981 |
| Parties | , 31 UCC Rep.Serv. 643 FLORIDA FROZEN FOODS, INC., Respondent, v. NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Appellant. |
Poskanzer, Hessberg, Blumberg, Dolin, Barba, Greisler & Trombly, Albany, (Anthony J. Carpinello, Albany, of counsel), for appellant.
Lynn & Lynn, Albany (Richard J. Miller, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.
Before SWEENEY, J. P., and MAIN, MIKOLL, YESAWICH and HERLIHY, JJ.
Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 14, 1979 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on its first cause of action, and (2) from an order of said court, entered February 27, 1980 in Albany County, which denied defendant's motion for reargument.
Plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover damages arising from the alleged wrongful stoppage of payment on cashier's checks issued by the defendant bank to plaintiff in exchange for checks in like amount drawn on the bank by one of its depositors, Food Fair, Inc., and made payable to plaintiff as payee. Defendant admitted in its answer that it had stopped payment on the cashier's checks issued to plaintiff. As an affirmative defense, defendant alleged fraudulent inducement on plaintiff's part in having defendant issue said cashier's checks in that plaintiff had failed to disclose to defendant that it had learned that Food Fair, Inc. was about to file a petition in Federal Bankruptcy Court on the same day the cashier's checks were issued. Defendant moved pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment which was granted by Special Term.
Defendant contends on appeal that summary judgment should not have been granted because substantial issues of fact relating to plaintiff's fraud were raised. We find no merit in defendant's position. It is well established that a cashier's check "is the primary obligation of the issuing bank which, acting as both drawer and drawee, accepts the check upon its issuance" (Dziurak v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 44 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 406 N.Y.S.2d 30, 377 N.E.2d 374). Pursuant to section 4-303 of the Uniform Commercial Code, an order to stop payment comes too late if received after the bank has accepted the item. Because a cashier's check is accepted when issued, it is beyond the power of the bank to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Key Intern. Mfg. Inc. v. Stillman
...the Uniform Commercial Code, legal process cannot terminate a bank's duty to pay such an instrument (Florida Frozen Foods v. National Bank & Trust Co., 81 A.D.2d 978, 979, 439 N.Y.S.2d 771, mot. for lv. to app. den. 55 N.Y.2d 601, 446 N.Y.S.2d 1024, 431 N.E.2d 309; Kaufman v. Chase Manhatta......
-
Mutual Sav. and Loan v. National Bank of Detroit
...pay it upon demand. Consequently, this promise to pay ordinarily cannot be countermanded. Florida Frozen Foods, Inc. v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 81 A.D.2d 978, 439 N.Y.S.2d 771 (1981); Wertz v. Richardson Heights Bank & Trust, 495 S.W.2d 572 (Tex., A cashier's check is generall......
-
Di Roma v. Merchants Bank of New York
...in New York when the defense is raised that the cashier's check was procured by fraud. In Florida Frozen Foods, Inc. v. National Commercial Bank and Trust Co., 81 A.D.2d 978, 439 N.Y.S.2d 771 the defendant bank asserted the fraudulent procurement of its cashier's check as a defense. By look......
-
Gates v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co./Capital Region
...checks does not, as plaintiff contends, preclude it from asserting any defense against any party. Florida Frozen Foods v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 81 A.D.2d 978, 439 N.Y.S.2d 771, mot. for lv. to app. den. 55 N.Y.2d 601, 446 N.Y.S.2d 1024, 431 N.E.2d 309, upon which plaintiff r......