Florida Glass & Mirror Co. of Orlando, Inc. v. Economy King Equipment Co., 76-2586
| Decision Date | 13 December 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-2586,76-2586 |
| Citation | 353 So.2d 596 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | FLORIDA GLASS & MIRROR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., Appellant, v. ECONOMY KING EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al., Appellees. |
Robert B. Worman of Waterhouse & Worman, Orlando, for appellant.
Robert G. Murrell of Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for Appellee-Economy King Equipment Co.
We have considered the issues raised by the appellant and cross-appellant in this mechanic's lien foreclosure case and find no reversible error. We also grant appellee's motion for attorney's fees.
The award of attorney's fees merits discussion. Section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1975), provides for recovery of attorney's fees by the prevailing party in any action brought to enforce a mechanic's lien. The Supreme Court in Sunbeam Enterprises, Inc. v. Upthegrove, 316 So.2d 34 (Fla.1975), held that Section 713.29 referred only to attorney's fees at the trial level and did not provide for the allowance of such fees on appeal. Since that time the Legislature has enacted an amended version of Section 59.46, Florida Statutes, which took effect on October 1, 1977. (Chapter 77-76, Laws of Florida.)
In the absence of an expressed contrary intent, any provision of statute or contract entered into after October 1, 1977, providing for the payment of attorney's fees to the prevailing party, shall be construed to include the payment of attorney's fees to the prevailing party on appeal. Section 59.46(1), Florida Statutes (1977)
We conclude that the phrase, "entered into after October 1, 1977," refers only to contracts and has no bearing on the time of enactment of statutes. We therefore hold that Section 713.29 when construed in the light of Section 59.46 now permits recovery of reasonable attorney's fees by the prevailing party on appeal.
Because the amended version of Section 59.46 took effect on October 1, 1977, and this court's determination of this appeal occurred after that date, the appellee, as the prevailing party, is entitled to the payment of reasonable attorney's fees on appeal. The law in effect at the time of appellate disposition is to be applied. Guth v. Guth, 346 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
Affirmed and remanded to the trial court for the determination and award of reasonable attorney's fees to appellee as the prevailing party on appeal.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ship Shape v. Taylor
...this court may award attorney's fees herein. As support for his argument, the claimant cites Florida Glass & Mirror Co. v. Economy King Equipment Co., 353 So.2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, that case is clearly not controlling. In Florida Glass, the court first noted that § 713.29, Fla......
-
University Community Hosp. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
...the claim is controlled by the statute in its current or amended form and it relies upon Florida Glass and Mirror Company of Orlando, Inc. v. Economy Equipment Company, 353 So.2d 596 (4th DCA 1977), for the principle that the statute in effect at the time of the appellate court's dispositio......
-
Hargitay v. Pipes
...1982). Appellee's motions for attorney's fees on appeal is granted in the amount of $1,000. See Florida Glass & Mirror Co. v. Economy King Equipment Co., 353 So.2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 59.46, Fla.Stat. ...
-
Walker v. Senn
...award of attorney's fees in mortgage foreclosures for services rendered on appeal. See Florida Glass and Mirror Company v. Economy King Equipment Company, 353 So.2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). However, appellants have failed to demonstrate that any significant portion of the award was for appe......