Florida Indus. Com'n v. Felda Lumber Co.
Decision Date | 09 June 1944 |
Citation | 154 Fla. 507,18 So.2d 362 |
Parties | FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v. FELDA LUMBER CO. et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Hendry County; George W. Whitehurst judge.
Allen Clements and Raymond E. Barnes, both of Tallahassee, and William Barfield, of Jacksonville, for appellant.
Henderson Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Parker Holt, all of Fort Myers, for appellees.
On October 16th 1939, D. J. Allen was injured while engaged in the course of his employment. Shortly after the injury Allen died. No alleged dependents filed claim for compensation within one year from date of injury or from date of death of Allen. On October 30th, 1942, Florida Industrial Commission advised employer that hearing would probably be held to determine whether or not Allen's death was caused by the injury. On February 12th, 1943, an investigation and hearing was conducted by a Deputy Commissioner for the purpose of determining whether or not the Florida Industrial Commission was entitled to statutory contribution to the Commission of the sum of $500 by the employer and carrier because of the death of Allen under the provisions of Section 440.16(2)(g), Fla.Stat.1941, same F.S.A. 1941, which sub-section reads as follows:
At the hearing supra, the employer and carrier appeared and controverted the claim on the following grounds, viz:
'1. That death was not caused by accident or injury within the meaning of this act.
'2. That no claim was filed within the time required by law.
In support of the position stated in grounds 2 and 3, supra, reliance is based on Sec. 440.19(1), which is as follows:
Pursuant to hearing, the Deputy Commissioner entered his finding and award in effect as follows: (1) That the death of the deceased D. J. Allen was a result of an injury by accident arising in and out of the course of his employment. (2) That the statute of limitations did not run against the Florida Industrial Commission, a state agency. (3) That the Florida Industrial Commission was entitled to $500.
On appeal to full Commission the findings and award of the Deputy Commissioner were affirmed in toto.
On appeal to the Circuit Court the findings and award of the full Commission were reversed in part and affirmed in part by an order inter alia, as follows:
'That the finding of the Full Commission affirming the Order of the Deputy Commissioner entered herein on the 27th day of February, 1943, to the effect that the statutory limitation of one year for making claim does not apply to the Florida Industrial Commission and in making Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars statutory award to the Florida Industrial Commistion be, and the same is, hereby reversed.
So it affirmatively appears that the Deputy Commissioner, the full Commission and the Circuit Court found and held that death was due to injuries received under conditions resulting in liability upon the employer and carrier, but the Circuit Court reversed the holding of the full Commission as to the enforcement of liability by holding that the enforcement of the claim was barred by the provisions of Section 440.19(1), supra.
It is not necessary to discuss the evidence on which the Deputy Commissioner, the full Commission and the Circuit...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Crocker's Estate
...123; In re Frey's Estate, 342 Pa. 351, 21 A.2d 23; State v. Stone, Tex.Civ.App.1954, 271 S.W.2d 741; Florida Industrial Commission v. Felda Lumber Co., 154 Fla. 507, 18 So.2d 362. See also 53 C.J.S., Limitations of Actions, § 15, p. 940. The cases are in conflict, however, on the question o......
-
Gay v. Inter-County Tel. & Tel. Co., INTER-COUNTY
...Officers of the Executive Department the Board of Commissioners of State Institutions. In the case of Florida Industrial Commission v. Felda Lumber Co., 154 Fla. 507, 18 So.2d 362, we held that a statute of limitations will not be held applicable to claims and demands of the State of Florid......
-
Smith's Estate, In re, 2165
...non-claim. The appellant cites to us as authority the cases of Heidt v. Caldwell, Fla.1949, 41 So.2d 303; Florida Industrial Comm. v. Felda Lumber Co., 1944, 154 Fla. 507, 18 So.2d 362; and United States v. Embrey, 1940, 145 Fla. 277, 199 So. 41. We shall also discuss United States v. Summe......
-
State v. Moore's Estate
...made applicable to the State of Florida.' The court in the Heidt decision also cited the opinion in Florida Industrial Commission v. Felda Lumber Co. et al., 154 Fla. 507, 18 So.2d 362, in which it was declared that statutes of liminations will not affect claims of the State unless by expre......