Florida Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 30 March 1936 |
Citation | 167 So. 378,123 Fla. 525 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | FLORIDA NAT. BANK OF JACKSONVILLE et al. v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. |
Rehearing Denied April 28, 1936.
Bill by the Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company against the Florida National Bank of Jacksonville as trustee, and others. From an interlocutory order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the bill, defendants appeal.
Reversed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Miles W. Lewis, judge.
J. W Harrell and W. P. Dineen, both of Jacksonville, for appellants.
Rogers Hazard & Thames, of Jacksonville, for appellee.
From an interlocutory order denying appellants' motion to dismiss a bill of complaint filed by a corporate mortgage bond coupon holder to foreclose the mortgage for the payment of certain of the mortgage bond coupons that had been assigned to it the movants (defendants below) have appealed to this court for reversal.
The bill of complaint filed August 7, 1934, shows the following: That on November 1, 1919, the Florida Fair & Exposition Association, Inc., a corporation, executed and delivered to the American Trust Company, as trustee, its mortgage and deed of trust encumbering its real estate at Jacksonville, Fla., to secure payment of a corporate mortgage bond issue aggregating $150,000, all to become due January 1, 1935, drawing interest at the rate of 7 per cent. per annum, evidenced by coupon notes attached to the mortgage bonds, which coupons are, by the terms of the instruments involved, negotiable by delivery; that the complainant below, Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company, a corporation, is the bona fide owner and holder of $2,408 of said coupons that passed into the hands of complainant's assignor, for a valuable consideration, prior to maturity of the bonds to which they had been annexed; that the Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, a corporation, has been and is a substituted trustee under the mortgage, for the American Trust Company; that said substituted trustee has failed and refused to execute the trust devolving upon it as such substituted trustee, and on the contrary has acquiesced in allowing other claimants against the mortgagor to reduce their claims to judgment against said Florida Fair & Exposition Association and has allowed said mortgagor, Florida Fair & Exposition Association, Inc., to wrongfully and illegally misapply and divert from the payment of interest in default on the mortgage bonds, several thousand dollars out of the income of the defendant, since March, 1928; that the action of the said substituted trustee in acquiescing in, or permitting, the defaults complained of, and in failing to take possession of and protect the mortgaged property as authorized by the mortgage trust deed, has necessitated the complainant to file a bill for foreclosure of the mortgage for the collection of its interest coupons, to secure which the mortgage in terms creates a lien; and that the court should allow complainant as a coupon holder to maintain said foreclosure and have other appropriate relief incident thereto, such as a receiver, accounting, costs, attorney's fees, and a sale of the mortgaged property to satisfy the complainant's demands.
The question raised by the motion of defendants below to dismiss the bill is whether or not the facts alleged in the bill of complaint make out a case entitling the mortgage bond coupon holder to foreclose the mortgage and trust deed for collection of its coupons when taken in conjunction with the provisions of the trust deed that specifically deny the right of any bond or coupon holder, secured thereby, to institute foreclosure proceedings without first giving notice in writing to the trustee, of the mortgagor's default, and unless the holders of 25 per cent. in amount of the bonds have first notified and requested in writing the trustee to foreclose the mortgage within a reasonable time after such notice, and without offering to indemnify the trustee against costs and liabilities to be incurred, as provided in the mortgage to be done to entitle a bond or coupon holder to thus sue.
The mortgage deed sued upon, which is attached to and made a part of the bill of complaint, contained the following provisions that are pertinent to a determination of the present controversy with respect to the question of law just propounded:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mississippi Cent. R. Co. v. Smith
... ... 181, 158 So ... 909; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Inman, 167 Miss. 288, 138 So. 339, ... 758; Davis ... v. Elzer, 126 Miss. 789; Nat. Life v. Williams, ... 169 Miss. 604; Whitley ... ...
-
Scott v. Platt
...N.Y.S. 256, aff. 263 N.Y. 671, 189 N.E. 750; Halle v. Van Sweringen Corp., 37 Del. 491, 185 Atl. 236; Florida National Bank v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 123 Fla. 525, 167 So. 378; Id., 125 Fla. 386, 169 So. 729, 108 A.L.R. 77; Enoch v. Brandon, 249 N.Y. 263, 164 N.E. 45; Bullowa v. ......
-
Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health E.
...dispute that no-action clauses are enforceable under the Bonds' respective applicable laws ( Fla. Natl. Bank of Jacksonville v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 123 Fla. 525, 167 So. 378 [1936];Varner v. Atlanta Laundries, 182 Ga. 148, 184 S.E. 877 [1936];Rittenhouse v. Lukens Steel Co., 1......
-
State v. Inter-American Center Authority
...that the trust indenture does not provide for foreclosure. It is true that in cases like Florida National Bank v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co., 123 Fla. 525, 167 So. 378, 108 A.L.R. 77, reasonable limitations on the right of foreclosure are sometimes included but in this case forec......