Florida Power & Light Co. v. Elmore
| Decision Date | 02 August 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 65--853,65--853 |
| Parties | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert L. ELMORE, Glen Damon, William Freeman, William Murray, as and constituting the surviving Trustees of Sunshine Contractors, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Scott, McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis and George W. Wright Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Blackwell, Walker, Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in an action in the circuit court in Dade County on trial of the cause before the court without a jury. The determinative question here, as in the trial court, is whether the agreement sued upon indemnified the indemnitee against losses resulting from its own negligence.
The circumstances which resulted in the loss for which the plaintiff sought indemnity are revealed in the reports of certain of the cases which arose between parties to the transaction. See Florida Power & Light Company v. Ahearn, Fla.1960, 118 So.2d 21; Ahearn v. Florida Power & Light Company, Fla.App.1961, 129 So.2d 457.
The indemnity contract as contained in the purchase order was as follows:
'Contractor, (Sunshine Contractors, Incorporated) upon acceptance of this purchase order, agrees to hold the Company free and unharmed against any liabilities whatsoever resulting in connection with performance of the described work by Contractor or its employees.'
The trial court was eminently correct in holding that the contract did not indemnify the indemnitee against losses resulting from its own negligence, and in so holding followed the law as established by the Supreme Court in Jackson v. Florida Weathermakers, Fla.1952, 55 So.2d 575, on rehearing at p. 579, and as held by this court in Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Company, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 298. And see Smith v. Ryan, Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 139, 141.
In the Jackson case the Supreme Court held that 'in the absence of clear and unequivocal terms (an indemnity contract) must be construed to be a contract to indemnify only against the negligence of the indemnitor, and not that of the indemnitee,' citing 27 Am.Jur., Indemnity, § 15 and the Annotation in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. J.M. Tull Metals Co.
...this rule in the context of implied contracts of indemnification is not raised in this appeal. See, e.g., Florida Power & Light Co. v. Elmore, 189 So.2d 522 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1966) (an express indemnity agreement would not be construed to indemnify against the indemnitee's own negligence whe......
-
Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
...(Fla.1979)); see also Gulf Oil Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co., 196 So.2d 456, 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Elmore, 189 So.2d 522, 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). To recover, the indemnitee has the burden of proving: (1) a breach of the indemnity contract; (2) the amount ......
-
Zantop Intern. Airlines, Inc. v. Eastern Airlines
...unharmed against any liabilities whatsoever resulting in connection with performance of the described work," Florida Power & Light Co. v. Elmore, 189 So.2d 522 (Fla.App., 1966) (emphasis added); "Licensee shall indemnify, protect and save the Licensor forever harmless from and against any a......
-
BVS Acquisition Co. v. Brown
...for clause providing indemnification for "all loss, costs, expense and damage to persons or property"); Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Elmore, 189 So. 2d 522, 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966) (same for clause providing indemnification for "any liabilities whatsoever"). While the On Target Court ul......