Florida Power & Light Co. v. Gilman

Decision Date03 July 1973
Docket NumberNo. 73-346,73-346
Citation280 So.2d 15
PartiesFLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Ruth Mirmelli GILMAN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for appellant.

Louis Vernell, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellee's complaint asking damages for personal injury was filed in October, 1970. The appellant filed its motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution on February 23, 1973. There is no question but that the record reflects no activity for one year prior to February 23, 1973. The trial judge denied the defendant's motion upon the basis that the plaintiff showed 'good cause' in a written response to the motion to dismiss. See Rule 1.420(e), RCP, 30 F.S.A. This interlocutory appeal is brought from the order denying the motion. The appellee has failed to file a brief.

The plaintiff's response to defendant's motion to dismiss stated that the plaintiff had changed attorneys and the new attorney had moved his office and misplaced her file. A change of attorneys, even when made necessary by misfortune, is not good cause for failure to prosecute for one year. Gulf Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Long, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 706; Miller v. Hartley's, Inc., Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 211. An office error by the plaintiff's attorney and that attorney's inadvertent failure to prosecute is not such good cause as is contemplated by the rule. See Conklin v. Boyd, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 401.

The order denying the plaintiff's motion to dismiss is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to grant the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Diaz
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 7, 1988
    ...Bakewell v. Shepard, 310 So.2d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Castle v. Struhl, 293 So.2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Gilman, 280 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Cf. Barnes v. Ross, 386 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA The thrust of the opinion below is that by virtue of having origina......
  • Overseas Development, Inc. v. Amerifirst Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 1983
    ...201 So.2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).3 St. Anne Airways Corp. v. Larotonda, 308 So.2d 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Florida Power and Light Co. v. Gilman, 280 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). See also Gulf Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Long, 53 So.2d 706 ...
  • Industrial Trucks of Florida, Inc. v. Gonzalez
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 1977
    ...201 So.2d 819 (Fla.4th DCA 1967).3 St. Anne Airways Corp. v. Larotonda, 308 So.2d 129 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Florida Power and Light Co. v. Gilman, 280 So.2d 15 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). See also Gulf Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Long, 53 So.2d 706 (Fla.1951).4 Shanley v. Allen, 346 So.2d 548 (Fla.......
  • St. Anne Airways Corp. v. Larotonda
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 18, 1975
    ...at least three cases which have considered a change of attorneys during the one year dormancy period. See, Florida Power & Light Company v. Gilman, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d 15; Miller v. Hartley's, Inc., Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 211; Gulf Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Long, Fla.1951, 53 So.2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT