Florida Star v. B.J.F., BK-253
| Decision Date | 15 December 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. BK-253,BK-253 |
| Citation | 499 So.2d 883,11 Fla. L. Weekly 2631 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2631 The FLORIDA STAR, Appellant, v. B.J.F., * Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Denise M. Prescod, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Miami, and Beckham, McAliley & Schulz, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.
Paul J. Levine and Wendy H. Cohen of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Miami, for Amicus Curiae, The Florida First Amendment Foundation.
This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages pursuant to a jury verdict. We affirm.
The threshold question is whether this court has jurisdiction. We find that appellant abandoned the post-trial motions, and we distinguish this case from Leopard v. State, 489 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and Lloyd v. Harrison, 489 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), wherein the post-trial motions were filed prior to the notice of appeal being filed. In those cases, the sequence of filing rendered the orders on appeal nonfinal until disposition of the post-trial motions; whereas the simultaneous filing, which occurred here, amounts to an abandonment of the post-trial motions. 1
Reaching the merits, we find that the information published, the rape victim's name, was of a private nature and not to be published as a matter of law. 2 See Doe v. Sarasota-Bradenton Florida Television Company, Inc., 436 So.2d 328, 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), particularly the reference to Opinion 075-203 of the Attorney General of Florida (July 14, 1975), which suggests that Section 794.03, Florida Statutes, be applied to the prosecution of parties publishing nonpublic information. Accordingly, we affirm.
* The style of the case has been revised by the court sua sponte in order to preserve appellee's privacy interests.
1 Our review of the record fails to reveal that any of the post-trial motions could be deemed "pending" at the time the notice of appeal was filed. Thus, there appears no error in the trial court's determination that it was divested of jurisdiction by the filing of the notice of appeal.
2 Section 794.03, Florida Statutes, is pertinent and states:
No person shall print, publish, or broadcast, or cause or allow to be printed, published, or broadcast, in any instrument of mass communication the name, address, or other identifying fact...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Florida Star v. B.J.F.
...the name of privacy by applying its prohibition evenhandedly to both the smalltime disseminator and the media giant. Pp. 537-541. 499 So.2d 883 (Fla.App.1986), reversed. MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, BLACKMUN, STEVENS, and KENNEDY, JJ., joined. SCALIA, ......
-
Forfeiture of $104,591 in U.S. Currency, In re, 90-1822
...Catalyst, Inc., 463 So.2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Griffith v. State, 435 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 509 So.2d 1117 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524, 109 S.Ct. 2603, 105 L.Ed.2d 443 ......
-
M.L.B. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 89-235
...1 The style of the case has been revised by the court sua sponte to preserve the child's privacy interests. See The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 509 So.2d 1117 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524, 109 S.Ct. 2603, 105 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989)......
-
A.A. v. E.P.
...the privacy interests of the children involved, initials have been substituted for the names of the parties. See The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 509 So.2d 1117 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524, 109 S.Ct. 2603, 105 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989......