Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Imp.
Decision Date | 27 February 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 97-980,97-980 |
Citation | 707 So.2d 841 |
Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D581 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT, etc., et al., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
S. Ansley Samson and David G. Guest, of the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Tallahassee, for Appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jonathan A. Glogau, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund.
Bram D.E. Canter, Tallahassee, for Appellees David A. Smith and Society National Trust Company.
Hume F. Coleman, and Robert R. Feagin, III, of Holland & Knight, Tallahassee, for Appellee David A. Smith.
Appellants, Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. and Save Our St. Johns River, Inc., appeal from an order denying their motions to intervene in a lawsuit over the ownership of approximately 250 acres of land fronting Lake Poinsett in Brevard County.
The Board of the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund ("Trustees"), the state agency vested with title to all sovereignty lands underlying navigable water bodies held by the state in trust for the use and benefit of the public, asserted that the disputed land was located below the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The Trustees filed a two-count complaint asserting claims for trespass, damages, and ejectment. The appellants unsuccessfully sought to intervene pursuant to Rule 1.230, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 They argued they had a direct and immediate interest in the controversy and the Trustees would not adequately protect their interest. The Trustees did not oppose the motion to intervene and have filed a brief in favor of the appellants' motions to intervene. On appeal, the appellants argue that the trial court abused its discretion by denying intervention. We affirm.
In Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla.1992), the Florida Supreme Court established a two-step analysis to decide if the trial court should grant a motion to intervene. The court wrote:
First, the trial court must determine that the interest asserted is appropriate to support intervention.... Once the trial court determines that the requisite interest exists, it must exercise its sound discretion to determine whether to permit intervention.
Id., at 507. See also Morgareidge v. Howey, 75 Fla. 234, 78 So. 14 (1918) ( ) The trial court correctly applied the two-step analysis established by Union Central. Although the court determined that the appellants showed a direct and immediate interest in the case, the trial court also found that the Trustees, a responsible governmental entity, will fully protect the appellants' interest. See Southland Life Ins. Co. v. Abelove, 556 So.2d 805 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Charlotte County Development Commission v. Lord, 180 So.2d 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Moreover,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Litvak v. Scylla Properties, LLC
...argues the general proposition that there is no absolute right to intervention. See Fla. Wildlife Fed'n, Inc. v. Bd. of Trs. of the Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (affirming denial of a motion to intervene where, although would-be intervenors showed a direct an......
-
WINGROVE EST. ASS'N v. PAUL CURTIS REALTY
...230 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); O'Connell v. Rabin, 596 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Imp., 707 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). The Associations also rely upon Marelli, which involved a zoning variance matter. After the va......
-
Fasig v. Florida Society of Pathologists
...of discretion. See Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla.1992); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); John G. Grubbs, Inc. v. Suncoast Excavating, Inc., 594 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA In Union Ce......
-
Bruce v. Hollingsworth, 3D01-1454.
...See Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle, 813 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Florida Wildlife Fed'n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So.2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA ......