Flowers v. Haskins, 70-717
| Decision Date | 03 March 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 70-717,70-717 |
| Parties | , 54 O.O.2d 296 FLOWERS v. HASKINS, Supt., London Correctional Institution. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Hobart Flowers, in pro. per.
Paul W. Brown, Atty. Gen., and James L. Hoover, Columbus, for respondent.
Petitioner is presently in custody pursuant to two sentences imposed on him following convictions for two separate crimes. Even assuming the validity of petitioner's contention concerning his 1968 conviction he is still properly incarcerated on his sentence on his 1967 conviction. He is not, therefore, entitled to release in habeas corpus. Ball v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St.2d 77, 204 N.E.2d 62.
Petitioner has an available remedy by postconviction proceedings for contesting the validity of his 1968 conviction for breaking and entering an inhabited dwelling in the night season.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Jackson v. Henderson
...400, 183 A.2d 424 (1962); Brown v. Justice's Court of Carson Township, 83 Nev. 272, 428 P.2d 376 (1967); Flowers v. Haskins, 25 Ohio St.2d 186, 267 N.E.2d 430 (1971); Stover v. Page, 450 P.2d 511 (Okl.Ct.Crim.App.1969); McCall v. State, 247 S.C. 15, 145 N.E.2d 419 (1965); Pulley v. Hunt, 44......
-
State v. Thomas
...in that case was lawfully incarcerated on charges unrelated to the asserted issue of collateral estoppel. See Flowers v. Haskins (1971) 25 Ohio St.2d 186, 267 N.E.2d 430, certiorari denied, 403 U.S. 908, 91 S.Ct. 2216, 29 L.Ed.2d 685; Ball v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St.2d 77, 204 N.E.2d 62; ......
- Conkle v. Conkle
-
Swiger v. Seidner, 95-1987
...to sentence him on one of the crimes does not warrant his release in habeas corpus. Flowers v. Haskins (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 186, 186-187, 54 O.O.2d 296, 297, 267 N.E.2d 430, 430-431. The trial court possessed jurisdiction to try, convict, and sentence Swiger on the kidnapping charge. That ......