Flowers v. Helm
| Decision Date | 31 January 1860 |
| Citation | Flowers v. Helm, 29 Mo. 324 (Mo. 1860) |
| Parties | FLOWERS, Defendant in Error, v. HELM et al., Plaintiffs in Error. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1.A party can not complain of an instruction given at his own instance.
2.Declarations with respect to partnership transactions by one partner are not evidence against the other partners unless made during the existence of the partnership.
Error to Carrol Circuit Court.
It is deemed unnecessary to set forth the facts more fully than they are stated in the opinion of the court.
Harris, for plaintiffs in error.
I.The court should have sustained the motion asking the court to instruct the jury to retire and make up their verdict respecting the liability of two of the defendants, James and Simon Helm. (26 Mo. 586;Sess. Acts, 1857, p. 181.)The declarations made by Jacob Helm were not evidence as against the others.They were made after the dissolution of the partnership.(23 Mo. 185;27 Mo. 553.)The instructions given were erroneous.The court erred in refusing the instructions.
Troxell & Ray, for defendant in error.
I.The court properly overruled the motion made by the defendants.The court committed no error in giving or refusing instructions.
As there is a difference between the record as it appears before us and the statement of the case as made by counsel, we must of course be governed by the record as it is written.The instruction of which most complaint is made by the defendants it appears was given on motion of the defendants themselves.It is numbered five, and is to the effect that the declarations of Jacob Helm are to be regarded by the jury as evidence against himself only, unless the jury find that he and the other defendants were partners; and if they were partners, then such declarations were to be regarded as evidence against the other partners so far as they related to the partnership transactions.This instruction is too...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
The Evangelical Synod of North America v. Schoeneich
...1 Greenl. Ev. [15 Ed.], sec. 112; Story on Part., secs. 107, 323; Brady v. Hill, 1 Mo. 315; Little v. Ferguson, 11 Mo. 598; Flowers v. Helm, 29 Mo. 324; Dowzelot Rawlings, 58 Mo. 75. The affidavit being ex parte was nothing more than a mere voluntary statement and we think clearly inadmissi......
-
Baker v. The Kansas City, fort Scott & Memphis v. Company
...v. Railroad, 104 Mo. 381. (8) A party can not complain of an instruction given at his request. Chamberlain v. Smith, 1 Mo. 482; Flowers v. Helm, 29 Mo. 324; Crutchfield v. Railroad, 64 Mo. 255; Tetherow Railroad, 98 Mo. 74. (9) A party can not try his case on one theory and then in this cou......
-
Curtis v. Sexton
...a co-partner, although relating to a contract which arises during the partnership. Abbott's Trial Evidence (2 Ed.), p. 271; Flowers v. Heim, 29 Mo. 324; Brady v. 1 Mo. 315. (9) Plaintiff can only recover, if at all, upon the theory of the case upon which his petition proceeds. Bank v. Campb......
-
Green v. Cole
...instruction was erroneous; but as its error was in favor of defendant he can not complain of the court's action in that regard. Flowers v. Helm (1860), 29 Mo. 324; Reardon Railroad (1893), 114 Mo. 384, 21 S.W. 731c. Even if that error (made at his request) produced a conflict in the instruc......