Flowers v. State

Decision Date26 July 1991
Docket NumberCR-89-149
Citation586 So.2d 978
PartiesClayton Joel FLOWERS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Al Pennington, Mobile, and W. Donald Bolton and Thack H. Dyson, Foley, for appellant.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Sandra Stewart and Ed Carnes, Asst. Attys. Gen., and John David Whetstone, Dist. Atty., Bay Minette, for appellee.

TYSON, Judge.

Clayton Joel Flowers, the appellant, was indicted for the capital murder of Karen Rolin. Specifically, the appellant was charged with intentional murder during the course of sodomy, in violation of § 13A-5-40(a)(3), Code of Alabama 1975. The jury found the appellant guilty as charged in the indictment. At the sentencing phase of the trial, the jury, by a vote of 11 to 1, recommended that the appellant be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. The trial judge rejected that jury's recommendation and sentenced the appellant to death. The appellant was 15 years of age at the time this offense was committed.

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on the morning of June 5, 1990, Melissa Stone saw Karen Rolin at the Delchamps grocery store in Bay Minette with two young boys. Later that morning, the body of Karen Rolin was found floating under the Hollinger Creek Road bridge in Baldwin County, Alabama. A tire tool and a tire jack were found near the body. There was blood on The appellant gave two statements regarding the victim's death, the first to the Bay Minette Police Department and the second to the Baldwin County Sheriff's Department. The following is a summary of those statements. In the early morning hours of June 5, 1990, the appellant and Bill Caraway were at Raymond White's house when the victim picked them up. The three went to Delchamps, where the victim attempted to cash her paycheck and then they got some gasoline. At this point, Caraway was driving, and he drove to Pine Grove Middle School. There, the victim said she wanted to have sex with the appellant, and they did. The appellant said that he used a condom. Afterwards, Caraway wanted to have sex with her. At this point, they all got out of the car and the appellant sat on the trunk of the car. The victim performed oral sex on the appellant while Caraway had anal intercourse with her. The appellant said that he had anal intercourse with the victim also. They then got back into the car and Caraway drove to Hollinger Creek Road bridge where Caraway got out of the car and told the appellant to get out. Caraway told the appellant that he wanted to "shut her mouth." Caraway then went and opened the trunk and told the victim to get out of the car. The appellant told Caraway that he did not want to be involved, and he got back in the car. Caraway began hitting the victim with his fists and a tire tool and then he told the appellant to get out of the car. When the appellant got out, Caraway handed him the tire tool and told him to hit the victim. The appellant threw down the tire tool. Then Caraway handed the appellant a tire jack, and the appellant hit the victim with it one time, but he thought that she was already dead. Caraway and the appellant then dragged the victim across the bridge and threw her body into the creek. Caraway and the appellant drove to Forest Park Lake. Caraway wedged a stick against the accelerator of the victim's car, and the car went into the lake. Caraway and the appellant then went to White's house and White took him home.

the bridge and on the guard rail of the bridge. That same morning, the victim's car was found some distance away in Forest Park Lake.

Dr. Leroy Riddick performed the autopsy on the victim's body. The autopsy revealed numerous lacerations to the head and face, multiple fractures to the skull, and defensive wounds to the arms. Dr. Riddick testified that the victim died of multiple blunt force injuries to the head and that those injuries could have been caused by a tire jack. The autopsy also revealed the presence of six tears around the anus and that semen was present in the anus. Riddick stated that the tears to the anus would have been painful.

Forensic tests showed that blood found on the victim's car was the same type as the victim's blood. A footprint impression taken near a pool of blood on the bridge matched the shoeprint of one of the appellant's shoes. Vaginal swabs taken from the victim were negative for the presence of seminal fluid but anal swabs taken from the victim were positive for the presence of seminal fluid. No semen was found in a condom which was found in the victim's car. Twelve of the victim's finger prints or palm prints were found on the top of the trunk of her car. Thirteen of the appellant's finger prints and palm prints were found on various places inside and outside of the victim's car. Two of the appellant's palm prints were found overlapping two of the victim's palm prints on the trunk. The palm prints of the appellant and the victim were facing different directions. The appellant's and the victim's palm prints were also found on the driver's window.

The appellant's testimony at trial differed somewhat from his statements which were given to the police. The appellant testified that after he and the victim had had consensual sex at the Pine Grove Middle School, Caraway got in the backseat with the victim and the appellant took a walk. A while later, Caraway called him back to the car. The victim seemed upset and Caraway was mad. Caraway then drove to Hollinger Creek Road bridge where he stopped and told the appellant that he needed to talk to him outside of the car. The appellant got out of the car and

                Caraway opened the trunk and said "We need to make sure she don't say anything" because "she wouldn't give it to me, so I took it."   The appellant replied that he "wasn't going to have no part of this."   Caraway told the victim to get out of the car, and the appellant got back into the car and listened to the radio.  A few minutes later, Caraway told the appellant to get out of the car.  When he did, the appellant saw the victim lying on the ground and saw Caraway with a tire tool in his hand.  Caraway handed him the tire tool and told the appellant to hit the victim.  The appellant threw it down.  Caraway then handed the appellant the tire jack and said, "Hit her with this or I will hit you with it."   The appellant then threw the jack down and he vomited.  He doesn't remember whether he hit the victim with the jack.  The appellant heard a splash and then heard the trunk close.  He and Caraway got back in the car and drove to Forest Park Lake.  The appellant got out of the car and started walking.  He heard the sound of a motor and a splash.  The appellant and Caraway then returned to White's house
                
I

The appellant contends that his statements to the police should have been suppressed for several reasons. The following testimony was taken at the suppression hearing.

Larry Durant and Alec McDowell, the assistant police chief and the police chief of the Bay Minette Police Department, took the first statement from the appellant. They testified that the appellant voluntarily came to the police station with his stepfather, Harold Eliott, after McDowell had contacted the appellant's family and told them that he needed to talk to the appellant about the murder of Karen Rolin. When the appellant arrived at the station, Durant advised the appellant of his Miranda rights and his right to have a parent present while he was questioned. At this point, the appellant stated that he wanted his stepfather there with him. Eliott said that his wife, the appellant's mother, was too upset to be there and that she wanted him there. Eliott was with the appellant during the interrogation. At some point during the interrogation, the appellant's father, Ronald Flowers, came to the police station. Durant asked the appellant if he wanted his father present and the appellant said that he did not. Durant and McDowell stated that the appellant voluntarily made the statement and that no threats, no inducements, or no promises were made to the appellant and no hopes of reward offered in order to obtain his statement. The appellant did not appear to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time he made his statement. Although the appellant was upset and crying, he appeared to understand what was happening and he could communicate with the officers.

Investigators Ronald Everts and Richard Bryars of the Baldwin County Sheriff's Department took the second statement from the appellant. Everts advised the appellants of his rights by reading from a juvenile waiver form. They testified that no threats, no inducements, or no promises were made to the appellant and no hopes of reward were offered and that he voluntarily gave them a statement. The appellant was told he could have either one or both of his parents present. The appellant said he didn't want to see his natural father. The appellant never asked to see his natural parents or a lawyer. Bryars stated that no one prevented the natural parents from seeing the appellant.

Ronald Flowers, the appellant's natural father, testified that the appellant's brother informed him that the police were interrogating the appellant, although he knew the day before that the appellant was going to talk to the police. He went to the police station and asked to see the appellant. Durant told him "It's no use you going in there and seeing him because he is still in there being interrogated." Flowers did not see the appellant until after the interrogation. Flowers stated that his wife had custody of the appellant and that he knew that the appellant's stepfather, Eliott, went with the appellant to the police station. Flowers testified that he would have hired an attorney if he had been with the appellant during questioning.

Marilyn Flowers, the appellant's natural mother, testified that her husband, Harold Eliott, went with the appellant to the police station and that she...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Travis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 18, 1997
    ...to exclude testimony regarding these drawings, and the trial court granted the State's motion on the authority of Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 978, 986 (Ala. Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930, 112 S.Ct. 1995, 118 L.Ed.2d 591 "As a general rule, an accused may introduce any legal evide......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 28, 2000
    ...in a court of law. The accused cannot, for example, prove the guilt of another by the use of hearsay statements." See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 978 (Ala. Cr.App.), cert. denied, 596 So.2d 954 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930, 112 S.Ct. 1995, 118 L.Ed.2d 591 Moreover, even if this r......
  • Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 4, 1998
    ...testimony pertaining to Billy's confession would have been inadmissible under the traditional rule in Alabama. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 978, 985-87 (Ala.Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, 596 So.2d 954 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930, 112 S.Ct. 1995, 118 L.Ed.2d 591 (1992). See also ......
  • D.M.M. v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 17, 1994
    ...of such a person. This anonymity shall be observed in the body of any opinion and in the styling of the case...."2 In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 978, 990 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 596 So.2d 954 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930, 112 S.Ct. 1995, 118 L.Ed.2d 591 (1992), this Court ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Judge Carnes Becomes Chief Judge Carnes
    • United States
    • Alabama State Bar Alabama Lawyer No. 74-6, December 2013
    • Invalid date
    ...Hearings, 102d Cong. 163-69 (statement of Rick Harris).15. Confirmation Hearings, 102d Cong. 167.16. Id. at 168.17. See Flowers v. State, 586 So. 2d 978 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991).18. Letter from Assistant Attorney General Ed Carnes to Baldwin County District Attorney David Whetstone, Feb. 26, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT