Floyd v. State
Decision Date | 27 April 1955 |
Parties | John Paul FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Carr & O'Quin, Miami, J. Ben Watkins and Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bart L. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
This Court is asked to review an order of the trial court denying bail to the defendant in a criminal cause pending the determination of an appeal taken by him from the judgment and sentence.
The facts of the case are simple. The defendant below was tried before the trial judge without the intervention of a jury and was found guilty of the offense of crime against nature. Thereafter, the defendant appealed and then applied to the trial court for an appeal bond pending the review of the judgment and sentence. The application was denied by the trial judge for the following reasons:
(Emphasis supplied.)
The question for decision is whether, on the reasons given, the denial of the appeal bond was proper.
The law is settled in this jurisdiction that the matter of granting bail after conviction rests in the discretion of the trial court. Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407, 171 So. 226; Gray v. State, Fla., 54 So.2d 436. But just as in all other cases allowing the exercise of judicial discretion, the discretion used must be a sound discretion by which is meant that 'the adjudication is to be governed by a given standard of judicial action,' In re Jeffries' Estate, 136 Fla. 410, 181 So. 833, 838, and such discretion implies 'judgment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Greene v. State, 39453
...308 (Fla.1956) and Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407, 171 So. 226 (1936).3 Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956).4 Floyd v. State, 79 So.2d 778 (Fla.1955).5 See cases listed in Annots., 19 A.L.R. 807 (1922), 77 A.L.R. 1235 (1932), and 45 A.L.R. 458 (1926).6 See, e.g., Bowman v. United ......
-
Younghans v. State
...particular case. Towle v. State ex rel. Fisher, 3 Fla. 202, 214; Dixie Music Co. v. Pike, 135 Fla. 671, 185 So. 441, 447.' Floyd v. State, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 778, 780. We do not find, however, that this court has heretofore established a clear "standard of judicial action" by which trial co......