Floyd v. State, ED 101808
Decision Date | 12 May 2015 |
Docket Number | No. ED 101808,ED 101808 |
Citation | 461 S.W.3d 846 (Mem) |
Parties | Michael Floyd, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, for Movant/Appellant.
Mary Highland Moore, Jefferson City, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Michael Floyd appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous.Rule 29.15(k).An extended opinion would have no precedential value.We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
1All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Floyd v. Griffith
...was denied without an evidentiary hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief. Floyd v. State, 461 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. App. 2015). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Potosi Correctional Center in Mineral Point, Missouri. In the instant petition ......
- Tracy v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co., ED 102029