Flynn v. Holder, 10–55643.
| Decision Date | 01 December 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–55643.,10–55643. |
| Citation | 665 F.3d 1048,11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14446,2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17254 |
| Parties | Doreen FLYNN; Akiim Deshay; Mike Hamel; Mark Hachey; Kumud Majumder; MoreMarrowDonors.org; John Wagner, M.D., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Eric HOLDER Jr., Attorney General of the United States, sued in his Official Capacity, Defendant–Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Flynn v. Holder, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 665 F.3d 1048, was withdrawn from the bound volume because an amending and superseding opinion was filed on denial of rehearing en banc. For superseding opinion see 2012 WL 1001300.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
Flynn v. Holder
...and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges.ORDER The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on December 1, 2011, and published at 665 F.3d 1048, is amended as follows: At slip opinion page 20561, line 17, change to to . At slip opinion page 20561, footnote 12, change the footnote to, SeePub.L......
1 books & journal articles
-
Throw Me a Bone Marrow Transplant: Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and the National Organ Transplant Act
...02-09-majumder11_st_ N.htm.Id.National Organ Transplant Act, 42 U.S.C. § 274e(a) (2006).21 665 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2011).Id. at 1059.BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONIn order to make sense of the Flynn decision, it is necessary to understand bone marrow physiology and the technology underlying th......