Fontana Industries, Inc. v. Western Grain & Fertilizer Co.

Decision Date28 January 1959
Citation334 P.2d 611,167 Cal.App.2d 408
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesFONTANA INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTERN GRAIN & FERTILIZER CO., a corporation, Kern Valley Packing Co., a corporation, Oscar Rudnick and Mark Futerman, Defendants and Respondents. Civ. 5901.

Trent G. Anderson Jr., Los Angeles, for appellant.

Thomas M. Eckhardt, San Bernardino, and Borton, Petrini, Conron & Brown, Bakersfield, for respondents.

MUSSELL, Acting Presiding Justice.

This is an action for unlawful detainer and for damages. The first amended complaint contains two causes of action. In the first cause of action plaintiff alleges, among other matters, that on or about November 1, 1954, plaintiff and defendant Western Grain & Fertilizer Co., Inc., entered into a written agreement wherein plaintiff, as owner, leased to said defendant approximately 60 acres of the property commonly known as Fontana Farms, in San Bernardino county; that the lease was for a period of five years at an agreed rental per year and lessee agreed to pay the taxes; that it was further agreed that '* * * in the event the lessee abandons the premises or should the lessee default in any of the covenants herein contained, the lessor at his option may reenter and take possession of the premises and remove all persons and property thereto, and at his option terminate this lease'; that it was further provided that lessor acknowledges that certain items of fixtures were sold to the Kern Valley Packing Company; that lessee warrants that it is entitled to remove such items as were sold to the Kern Valley Packing Company primarily including the feed mill on the leased premises, and lessor consents to the removal of such items thus sold at any time during the terms of the lease. It is further alleged that defendant Western defaulted in the payments in the sum of $8,625; that plaintiff is informed and believes and therefore alleges that defendants have abandoned said premises in their entirety, and did so abandon said premises on or about the 30th day of March, 1956; that there are certain buildings, property of lessee, now located on said premises, consisting of a grain elevator building and of certain incidental structures and fence posts; that defendant Western has not removed said buildings and that the cost of removing them is the approximate sum of $15,000; that in said lease it is provided that lessee agrees to remove all rubbish from the premises; that the aforesaid grain elevator has partially burned and is therefore useless and that the expense of removing it is approximately $15,000.

The second cause of action, which relates a transaction antedating the foregoing by several years, is against the defendants Kern Valley Packing Company and Oscar Rudnick. Plaintiff alleges that on or about November 24, 1951, plaintiff was the owner of all the fixtures, buildings and equipment located on the real property described in the first cause of action; that plaintiff's assignors entered into a written agreement of sale with defendant Kern whereby said defendant purchased the fixtures located on said premises, including a grain elevator, grinding mill, with hog pens, runways and fence posts; that in said agreement defendant Kern agreed to accomplish the removal of all of said improvements within five months from the close of escrow and to leave the premises in an orderly and clean condition; that escrow was entered into between the parties, the purchase price of said buildings was paid and the escrow was closed on or about February 5, 1952; that more than five months have gone by since the close of said escrow, but defendant Kern has failed and neglected to remove the grain elevator and certain fence posts and other buildings incidental to said elevator, and that plaintiff was damaged thereby in the sum of $15,000.

The prayer of the complaint is for judgment against Western for unpaid rental and personal property taxes, for restitution and possession of the premises, for attorney's fees, and for $15,000 for cost of removal of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mihans v. Municipal Court
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 11, 1970
    ...in section 1161. (Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Chandler, 4 Cal.App.3d 716, 721, 84 Cal.Rptr. 756; Fontana Industries, Inc. v. Western Grain & Fertilizer Co., 167 Cal.App.2d 408, 411, 334 P.2d 611; Arnold v. Krigbaum, 169 Cal. 143, 146, 146 P. 423.) Accordingly, the general rule has Emerged that......
  • Union Oil Co. v. Chandler
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 1970
    ...primary purpose of which is to obtain the possession of real property in the cases specified by statute. (Fontana Industries v. Western Grain Co., 167 Cal.App.2d 408, 411, 334 P.2d 611; Markham v. Fralick, 2 Cal.2d 221, 227, 39 P.2d 804; Arnold v. Krigbaum, 169 Cal. 143, 146, 146 P. 423; se......
  • Balassy v. Superior Court
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 3, 1986
    ...146, 146 P. 423; Vasey v. California Dance Co., supra, 70 Cal.App.3d at p. 748, 139 Cal.Rptr. 72; Fontana Industries v. Western Grain Co. (1959) 167 Cal.App.2d 408, 411-412, 334 P.2d 611; Karz v. Mecham (1981) 120 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 5-6, 174 Cal.Rptr. Markham is materially indistinguishabl......
  • Holliday Land & Livestock Co. v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1977
    ...remedy. Where the unlawful detainer action fails, incidents allowable under the action fail. Fontana Industries, Inc. v. Western Grain & Fer. Co., 167 Cal.App.2d 408, 334 P.2d 611 (1959). This has been the rule in Montana since Bush v. Baker, 51 Mont. 326, 334, 152 P. 750 (1915). In Bush th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT