Forbes v. Allstate Ins. Co., 67-914

Decision Date14 May 1968
Docket NumberNo. 67-914,67-914
PartiesFrank FORBES, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Truett & Watkins, Harold Heller, Miami, and Michael J. Silverstein, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Weinstein, Weissenborn & Burr, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an adverse declaratory decree. The lower court held that the insured, who was plaintiff, was excluded from uninsured motorist protection by a provision in the policy negating coverage while the insured occupied a public conveyance. It is undisputed that plaintiff was injured while riding in a taxicab.

We are here presented with another of those provisions contained in automobile insurance policies, under the heading of 'uninsured motorist coverage' or 'family protection plan', which are more restrictive than is permissible under the terms of § 627.0851, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Our decision to reverse the order here appealed is based upon the recent cases of Butts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 73, and Travelers Indemnity Company v. Powell, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 244, neither of which had been released at the time the chancellor was required to rule.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Diaz-Hernandez v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 27 Maggio 2009
    ...(declaring invalid provision in UM policy that limits coverage to certain operators of the insured vehicle); Forbes v. Allstate Ins. Co., 210 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (declaring invalid an exclusion limiting coverage while the insured is an occupant of a public conveyance, such as a tax......
  • Allen v. West American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 19 Marzo 1971
    ...Company (D.C.App.) 234 A.2d 305; Hendricks v. Meritplan Insurance Company, 205 Cal.App.2d 133, 22 Cal.Rptr. 682; Forbes v. Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App., 210 So.2d 244; Vaught v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (8 Cir.) 413 F.2d 539; Hodges v. Canal Insurance Company, Miss., 223 S......
  • Hodges v. National Union Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 26 Maggio 1971
    ...Co., Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 73; National Service Fire Insurance Co. v. Mikell, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 343; Forbes v. Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 244; Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Mason, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 474; American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Williams......
  • Vaught v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 10 Luglio 1969
    ...v. McNeal, 115 Ga.App. 286, 154 S.E.2d 411 (1967). A clause restricting coverage as to public conveyances. Forbes v. Allstate Insurance Company, 210 So.2d 244 (Fla.App. 1968). 6 Other cases in which the court has discussed the statute are: Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Warren, Ark., ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT