Forbess v. Starnes
Decision Date | 25 January 1936 |
Citation | 89 S.W.2d 886 |
Parties | FORBESS v. STARNES et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
H. R. Boyd and Milton Williams, both of Memphis, for plaintiff in error.
E. B. Klewer, of Memphis, for defendants in error.
This is a workmen's compensation case, under which the trial court made a statutory award in favor of the surviving widow of Barney Forbess, employee of the defendant. Petitioner has appealed from the court's order denying her interest and 25 per cent. penalty on the recovery, while the defendants have appealed from the award made against them.
The employee was a night watchman at a sawmill operated by defendants. The trial court made a written finding of facts. Omitting the finding as to the employment by defendants, the facts so found by the trial court are as follows:
These facts are supported by material evidence.
It will be observed that there existed between deceased and his assailant no relation of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Turner v. Bluff City Lumber Co.
...when he struck petitioner he (petitioner) did not make any attempt to strike him. Defendants rely on the cases of Forbess v. Starnes et al., 169 Tenn. 594, 89 S.W.2d 886, and Kinkead v. Holliston Mills, 170 Tenn. 684, 98 S.W.2d 1006. In the Forbess case, supra, O'Bryan, who killed deceased,......
- Forbess v. Starnes
-
Thornton v. Rca Service Co.
...met his death, not because he was a collector of the ice company, but because he was numbered in the crowd." In Forbess v. Starnes et al., 169 Tenn. 594, 89 S.W.2d 886, Forbess was properly on the premises of his employer and directed by his foreman to oil the mill. Forbess inquired of anot......