Ford Motor Co. v. Washington

Decision Date13 September 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11-612,11-612
PartiesFORD MOTOR COMPANY APPELLANT v. PAULETTE R. WASHINGTON APPELLEE
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

APPEAL FROM THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

[NO. CV-2003-627-1]

HONORABLE BERLIN C. JONES, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice

Appellant Ford Motor Company appeals from the judgment of the Jefferson County Circuit Court reflecting the jury's award of compensatory and punitive damages in favor of appellee Paulette R. Washington, individually and as administratrix of the Estate of Johnny Ray Washington, deceased, and as parent and legal guardian of Terian Washington, a minor. Ford also appeals the circuit court's denial of its postjudgment motions. On appeal, Ford contends that (1) the circuit court's exclusion of evidence that the decedent was not wearing a seat belt at the time of his automobile accident requires a new trial, (2) Washington's "improper glazing" claim is preempted by federal law, (3) Ford is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of punitive damages, and (4) the compensatory-damages award should be reduced by fifty percent, pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-61-204 to-205 (Repl. 2005). Because we conclude that there is no final order in this case, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

Washington's action arose out of an automobile accident that occurred on August 23, 2000, involving her husband, now deceased, and their minor child. According to testimony at trial, Karah Allen Williams, who was driving a 1997 Nissan Sentra, collided with the decedent's 1994 Ford Explorer. As a result of the collision, the Explorer slid toward and over a curb, rolled over twice, and landed right-side up. The decedent was transported to the emergency room, where he was later pronounced dead; their minor son survived the accident.

On August 14, 2003, Washington filed a complaint against Ford, the manufacturer of the Explorer; Freeway Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., the dealer that sold the vehicle; and Williams. Washington alleged claims against Ford and Freeway for negligence, strict liability, failure to warn, and breach of warranties. Washington also alleged that Williams was negligent in running a stop sign and was the proximate cause of the accident. Williams later entered into a settlement-and-release agreement with Washington, and on August 7, 2006, the circuit court entered an order dismissing with prejudice all claims against Williams.

At trial, Washington moved to nonsuit her claims against Freeway. Although the circuit court granted the motion orally, no written order to that effect is in the record. A voluntary nonsuit is "effective only upon entry of a court order dismissing the action." Ark. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (2011). Because no order dismissing Freeway from this case was entered, there is no final judgment as required by Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).

Under...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Washington
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 16, 2014
    ...due to the lack of a final order because no written order had been entered dismissing Freeway Ford. See Ford Motor Co. v. Washington, 2012 Ark. 325, 2012 WL 4017383 (“ Ford I ”). We then dismissed the second appeal for lack of finality because the judgment did not set forth a specific dolla......
  • Ark. State Claims Comm'n v. Duit Constr. Co.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 23, 2014
    ...presented as claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, or third-party claims, is not final for purposes of appeal. See Ford Motor Co. v. Washington, 2012 Ark. 325, 2012 WL 4017383. Although Rule 54(b) provides a method by which the circuit court may direct entry of a final judgment as to fewer t......
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Washington
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 28, 2013
    ...appeal without prejudice for lack of a final order because no written order dismissing Freeway Ford had been entered. See Ford Motor Co. v. Washington, 2012 Ark. 325. The circuit court then entered an order dismissing Freeway Fordwith prejudice, and this appeal followed. Even if neither par......
  • Morse v. Austin
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • April 26, 2017
    ...we must dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See Chitwood v. Chitwood , 2013 Ark. 195, 2013 WL 1932916 ; Ford Motor Co. v. Washington , 2012 Ark. 325, 2012 WL 4017383 ; Crafton, Tull, Sparks & Assocs. v. Ruskin Heights, LLC , 2012 Ark. 56, 2012 WL 401611 ; Patil v. Hoover , 2012 Ark. App. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT