Ford v. S. A. Lynch Corp.
Citation | 54 S.E.2d 320,79 Ga.App. 481 |
Decision Date | 23 June 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 32498.,32498. |
Parties | FORD. v. S. A. LYNCH CORPORATION. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Syllabus by the Court.
From the allegations of the petition in this case it appears that the plaintiff's injuries were the result of his own failure to exercise ordinary care in walking upon the marble floor of the hotel lobby while it was covered with soapy water, at the time and place in question, and in such circumstances the question of negligence is properly decided by the court as a matter of law. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition and in dismissing the action.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; Frank A. Hooper, Judge.
Action by T. H. Ford against S. A. Lynch Corporation, doing business as the Atlantan Hotel, for personal injuries. To review a judgment for the defendant, plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
T. H. Ford filed his suit against S. A. Lynch Corporation, d/b/a the Atlantan Hotel, in Fulton Superior Court, for $10,000 damages, on account of injuries allegedly sustained when he slipped and fell on the floor of the lobby of defendant's hotel where he was a guest.
The allegations of the petition, as amended, pertinent to the issues here involved, are as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.
...It does not necessarily follow that water on a floor is as patently slippery and dangerous as ice. The case of Ford v. S. A. Lynch Corp., 79 Ga.App. 481, 54 S.E.2d 320 is, in our opinion, erroneously decided and unsound. This case was decided by a full bench of six judges, two judges dissen......
-
Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.
...31 Ga.App. 402, 120 S.E. 683; Banks v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta, 79 Ga.App. 313, 53 S.E.2d 595; Ford v. S. A. Lynch Corp., 79 Ga.App. 481, 54 S.E.2d 320; Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co., 80 Ga.App. 840, 57 S.E.2d 680; Mattox v. Atlanta Enterprises, 91 Ga.App. 847, 87 S.E.2d 432; Bonne......
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Layne
...Authority of City of Atlanta, 79 Ga.App. 313, 53 S.E.2d 595; McMullan v. Kroger Co., 84 Ga.App. 195, 65 S.E.2d 420; Ford v. S. A. Lynch Corp., 79 Ga.App. 481, 54 S.E.2d 320; Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co., 80 Ga.App. 840, 57 S.E.2d 680; National Bellas-Hess Company v. Patrick, 49 Ga.App. 280, 17......
-
Rockmart Bank v. Hall
...denying a recovery to the plaintiff. See for example, Lebby v. Attlanta Realty Corp., 25 Ga.App. 369, 103 S.E. 433; Ford v. S. A. Lynch Corp., 79 Ga.App. 481, 54 S.E.2d 320; Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co., 80 Ga.App. 840, 57 S.E.2d 680; and the most recent case of Gibson v. Consolidated Credit C......