Forrester v. Cantley

Citation51 S.W.2d 550,227 Mo.App. 325
PartiesM. H. FORRESTER, APPELLANT, v. S. L. CANTLEY, COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE IN CHARGE OF THE LIQUIDATION OF MT. VERNON BANK, RESPONDENT
Decision Date15 June 1932
CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lawrence County.--Hon. Emery E Smith, Judge.

REVERSED AMD REMANDED (with directions).

Reversed and remanded.

Robert Stemmons and Rex V. McPherson for appellant.

Harry Whaley for respondent.

SMITH J. Cox, P. J., and Bailey, J., concur.

OPINION

SMITH, J.

--This is a suit in which the plaintiff is seeking to have allowed as an offset against his deposit in the Mt. Vernon Bank the amount of a note which he owed the bank. There is no controversy over the pleadings. The case was submitted to the court on the following agreed statement of facts:

"It is agreed that the following are the facts of this cause:

"1. That M. H. Forrester was elected Circuit Clerk for Lawrence county, Missouri, at the November election, 1926, for a term of four years, and qualified for said office and served his entire term; that he gave bond, which was duly approved, by the circuit judge, with the Detroit Fidelity & Surety Company, as surety, in the sum of five thousand dollars, conditioned that he 'shall faithfully perform the duties of his office and pay over all moneys which may come into his hands by virtue of his office, ' etc.

"2. That the Mt. Vernon Bank, pursuant to resolution of its board of directors closed on July 24, 1929, and the assets thereof were taken over by S. L. Cantley, Commissioner of Finance, for the purpose of liquidating said bank.

"3. That at the time of closing of said bank said M. H. Forrester had on deposit therein, and subject to check, a balance due from said bank in the sum of $ 1,543.67, which sum was deposited in an account carried on the books of said bank and known as 'M. H. Forrester, Circuit Clerk.' That the balance of $ 1,543.67 represented money which he had deposited in said bank in his official capacity of circuit clerk, and which he had collected as fees for officers, court costs, witness fees, etc., and for which he was liable on his official bond, but which he had not paid to the persons entitled thereto at the time of the trial.

"4. That S. L. Cantley, Commissioner of Finance of the State of Missouri, is now and at all times herein mentioned was in charge of said bank, and now has in his possession, a note, executed by M. H. Forrester, payable to said bank, bearing date of June 29, 1929, due 180 days after date, in the sum of $ 400 with interest thereon from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum, which note belonged to said bank and was held by the bank as an asset at the time it closed; that no part of said note has been paid; and there are no other offsets or credits against said sum of $ 1,543.67 due M. H. Forrester, circuit clerk.

"5. The question presented to the court is whether an offset of the principal and interest due on said note is allowable against said deposit."

The court found the issue in favor of the defendant, and denied to plaintiff the right to offset the balance due him, as circuit clerk, against said note, and judgment was rendered accordingly. No declarations of law were requested by either side and none were given.

Proper steps were taken for an appeal, and the case is here on the one assignment of error, namely, "The court erred in disallowing the offset of said deposit against said note."

The trial court erred in not holding that the relation of debtor and creditor existed between the bank and the plaintiff, and in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate Agency
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1938
    ... ... 1085, 279 S.W. 746; Potter v. Mount Vernon Roller Mill ... Co., 101 Mo.App. 581, 73 S.W. 1005; Special Road ... Dist. v. Cantley, 223 Mo.App. 89, 8 S.W.2d 944; Deal ... v. Bank, etc., 52 S.W.2d 201, Id., 79 Mo.App. 262; ... Stephens v. Bragg City, 224 Mo.App. 469, 27 .2d ... 1063; Parker, Curatrix, etc., v. Trust Co., 229 ... Mo.App. 1244, 71 S.W.2d 106; Forrester v. Cantley, ... 227 Mo.App. 325, 51 S.W.2d 550; Bartholomy, Guardian, v ... Harrison, 228 Mo.App. 872, 74 S.W.2d 69; Mo. Mut ... Assn., v ... ...
  • Buder v. Holt
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1938
    ...145; Coburn v. Carstarphen, 139 S.E. 597; Dalton v. Sturdivant Bank, 76 S.W.2d 426; Hanson v. Bank of La Grange, 147 S.E. 124; Forrester v. Cantley, 51 S.W.2d 551; Bros. v. Wilson, 69 S.W.2d 1020; 5 Michie on Banks & Banking, sec. 157-B, p. 300; 24 R. C. L., p. 865, sec. 70; 57 C. J., p. 44......
  • City of Aurora v. Stafford
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1932

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT