Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n of Texas v. Petty

Decision Date08 April 1926
Docket Number(No. 3202.)
Citation283 S.W. 620
PartiesFORT WORTH MUT. BENEV. ASS'N OF TEXAS v. PETTY.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Action by G. H. Petty against the Fort Worth Benevolent Association of Texas. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded.

Marvin Roberson, of Fort Worth, for plaintiff in error.

Perkins & Perkins, of Rusk, for defendant in error.

HODGES, J.

The plaintiff in error is a mutual benevolent association organized under the laws of Texas, with its domicile at Fort Worth, Tex. This appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of G. H. Petty by default awarding a recovery upon a policy of insurance theretofore issued upon the life of J. D. Petty by the plaintiff in error. It was alleged that the policy was issued on June 26, 1924, in consideration of certain payments, insuring J. D. Petty in a sum not to exceed $1,500. It is further alleged that J. D. Petty died in September, 1924, that he was a member in good standing at the time of his death, and his beneficiary was entitled to claim $1,500.

A citation was issued on April 25, 1925, which, after reciting the substance of the plaintiff's cause of action, directed the officer to summon the Fort Worth Mutual Benevolent Association of Texas in person by delivering "to said defendant, Fort Worth Mutual Benevolent Association of Texas, each in person, a true copy of this citation, together with a certified copy of the plaintiff's petition." The officer's return is as follows:

"Came to hand on the 9th day of April, 1925, at 8 o'clock a. m., and executed in Tarrant county, Texas, by delivering to each of the within named defendants, in person, a true copy of this citation (together with the accompanying certified copy of plaintiff's petition) at the following time and places, to wit: Fort Worth Mutual Benevolent Association of Texas, by serving F. M. Lipscomb, secretary, April 9th, 1925, at 9 a. m., Fort Worth.

"I actually and necessarily traveled 10 miles in the service of this citation, in addition to any other mileage I may have traveled in the service of other process in the same case during the same trip."

The case was called for trial in May, 1925. No answer having been filed by the plaintiff in error, defendant below, a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Petty, for the sum of $1,500, and a writ of mandamus was awarded for its enforcement. This writ of error is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Ford v. Grand United Order of Odd Fellows
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1932
    ...with the law and, therefore, void, and the court was without authority to enter the default judgment. Fort Worth Mut. Ben. Ass'n v. Petty (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 620; Fort Worth Mut. Ben. Ass'n v. Weathers (Tex. Civ. App.) 291 S. W. 267; Wonderful Workers of the World Ben. Ass'n v. Hamil......
  • Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Martin
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 19 Marzo 1927
    ...supra; Western Com. Travelers' Ass'n v. Tennent, supra. This holding is not in conflict with that in Ft. Worth Mut. Ben. Ass'n of Tex. v. Petty (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 620, because in that case the following language indicates that the court had evidence before it sufficient to show that......
  • Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Weathers
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 20 Enero 1927
    ...it is by serving the commissioner of insurance. This identical question was involved in the case of Fort Worth Mutual Benevolent Association of Texas v. Petty (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 620, in which case the opinion fully sustains appellant's contention. The same rule is announced in Mosai......
  • Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n. v. Petty
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 20 Enero 1927
    ...court sustained the contention made, quashed the citation, and reversed the judgment and remanded the cause. Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Petty (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 620. The next term of the district court began December 14, 1925, and was authorized to continue until the second Mon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT