Fortune v. Boutwell, 4 Div. 8
Decision Date | 17 November 1960 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 8 |
Citation | 271 Ala. 592,126 So.2d 116 |
Parties | Joel D. FORTUNE et al. v. J. C. BOUTWELL et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Alice L. Anderson, Enterprise, for appellants.
Robt. B. Albritton, Andalusia, and B. B. Rowe, Enterprise, for appellees.
Appellants filed their bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Coffee County, Alabama, in Equity, which sought to set aside a deed made by Mrs. Lonnie Fortune to J. C. Boutwell and Shelby Boutwell on July 24, 1956, on an allegation which claimed undue influence and lack of mental capacity of the grantor to convey land. Respondents, appellees, filed a cross bill asking for an affirmative decision that the deed was and is a proper deed of conveyance; that the legal title to the land in question is in J. C. Boutwell and Shelby Boutwell and for an injunction enjoining complainants from interfering with the use and possession of Mrs. Lonnie Fortune to the other lands owned by the grantor. Mrs. Lonnie Fortune, after being allowed by the court to intervene, joined in this cross bill. Subsequently, and before final decree, she died and the cause, as to her, was revived in the name of her personal representative.
Factually, the case presents the following: Mrs. Lonnie Fortune, the grantor, had been twice married and had two sets of children. Her first marriage when she was very young was to Calvin Boutwell. To this marriage there were born three children, one of whom is dead, leaving J. C. Boutwell and Shelby Boutwell, the appellees. Prior to his death, Calvin Boutwell deeded to Mrs. Lonnie Fortune, his then wife, 280 acres of land, which is the subject of this suit. After Boutwell's death, Mrs. Lonnie Fortune, grantor in the deed in question, married Andrew Fortune. To this last marriage there were several children born, all of whom are complainants, appellants here. After the marriage to Fortune, Mrs. Lonnie Fortune retained ownership of and lived on the land deeded her by her first husband. During her second marriage Mrs. Fortune's second husband, Andrew Fortune, acquired ownership of 40 acres of land, which was owned by him at his death. Upon the division of the estate of Stephen Smith, Mrs. Lonnie Fortune's father, Mrs. Fortune received as her part of the estate, 55 acres of land which was known as the 'Smith land' and which was owned by Mrs. Fortune at the time of her death on November 6, 1957. Mrs. Fortune continued to live with Andrew Fortune from the time of their marriage until his death on May 30, 1956.
On July 24, 1956, Mrs. Lonnie Fortune executed a deed to J. C. Boutwell and Shelby Boutwell, who were the living children of her first husband, Calvin Boutwell, to the 280 acres deeded her by her said husband prior to his death. These grantees were Boutwell's children. It is this deed which complainants, appellants, are seeking to have set aside and declared void.
The testimony was heard by the court ore tenus and upon final submission a decree was entered, from which we quote:
It is from this decree that the complainants appeal, on the ground that the same is contrary to the evidence, and the law in the case.
The law with regard to mental incapacity to avoid a conveyance of land is well settled. We have stated the governing principle in varying language: Incapacity to understand the business transacted, as distinguished from mere sickness, must be proved in order to avoid a conveyance. Stanfill v. Johnson, 159 Ala. 546, 49 So. 223. A person with sufficient mental ability to comprehend what he is doing and understand the nature of the act and its consequences has capacity to make a deed. Frederic v. Wilkins, 182 Ala. 343, 62 So. 518; Harris v. Bowles, 208 Ala. 545...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Anderson
...a conveyance. We stated the law with reference to mental incapacity to void a conveyance of land in the case of Fortune v. Boutwell, 271 Ala. 592, 595, 126 So.2d 116, 118 (1960). We observed in that case as follows: We have stated the governing principle in varying language: Incapacity to u......
-
Killough v. DeVaney
...the burden to repel the presumption when the transaction is assailed. Terry v. Terry, 336 So.2d 159 (Ala.1976). In Fortune v. Boutwell, 271 Ala. 592, 126 So.2d 116 (1960), this court noted (u)ndue influence which is required to avoid a conveyance must proceed from some act of dominance or c......
-
Baxley v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.
... ... Baxley cites the Alabama Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in ... Gibson v. Henderson, for the ... line(s) on page 3.” Doc. 41-1 at 6-8 ... Jackson ... responds that Smith ... competency unless a party proves otherwise. Fortune v ... Boutwell, 126 So.2d 116 (Ala. 1960); see also ... ...
-
Jackson v. Reed
...have the requisite knowledge and comprehension to understand the matters they dealt with. Justice Simpson, in Fortune v. Boutwell, 271 Ala. 592, 595, 126 So.2d 116, 118 (1960), capsulated the law as it existed at the time of his opinion (it has not changed since that time) with reference to......