Fortune v. Parks
Decision Date | 14 November 1911 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 1097 |
Citation | 119 P. 134,29 Okla. 698,1911 OK 384 |
Parties | FORTUNE v. PARKS et al. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Transcript--Sufficiency. Same as that in Wade et al v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95.
Error from District Court, Caddo County; G. A. Brown, Judge.
Action between C. C. Fortune and E. W. Parks and others. From the judgment, Fortune brings error. Dismissed.
C. H. Carswell, for plaintiff in error
A. J. Morris, for defendants in error
¶1 The plaintiff in error seeks to review the judgment of the lower court upon a transcript. The certificate of the clerk is as follows:
¶2 Counsel for defendants in error insist that, where a transcript on appeal fails to show affirmatively that it contains "a full, true and correct transcript of the record," the appellate court will not review the alleged errors; that it must appear from the certificate of the clerk that it is a complete transcript. That was the holding of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma Territory in Wade et al. v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95, following Whitney v. Harris, 21 Kan. 96; Eckert v. McBee, 25 Kan. 705; State v. Ricker, 40 Kan. 14, 19 P. 357; Neiswender v. James, 41 Kan. 463, 21 P. 573; Westbrook v. Schmaus, 51 Kan. 214, 32 P. 892.
¶3 Section 5939, Compiled Laws of Oklahoma 1909 (section 4308, Statutes of Oklahoma Territory 1893) provides:
¶4 Rule 16 of this court (20 Okla. xi, 95 P. vii) prescribes the form for certification of the transcript by the clerk, the body of which is as follows:
"I, , clerk of the district court for said...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mcguire v. Rash
... ... v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Bruce v. Casey-Swasy Co., 13 Okla 554 75 P. 280; Walcher v. Stone, 15 Okla. 130, 79 P. 771; Fortune v. Parks et al., 29 Okla. 698, 119 P. 134; E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank, 39 Okla. 788. 136 P. 744.2. Same--Record--Motions and ... ...
-
E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank of Mcqueen
... ... If the certificate shows less than this, the case will be dismissed." (Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Fortune v. Parks, 29 Okla. 698, 119 P. 134.) "A transcript of the record is not sufficiently authenticated unless the clerk's certificate states that it ... ...
-
Martin v. Milnor
...by case-made; and the other by transcript. Section 5240, Rev. Laws 1910; Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Fortune v. Parks et al., 29 Okla. 698, 119 P. 134; Green et al. v. Incorporated Town of Yeager, 23 Okla. 128, 99 P. 906. The method attempted to be pursued in the instant case ......
-
Manley v. Halsell
...14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Bruce v. Casey-Swasey Co., 13 Okla. 554, 75 P. 280; Walcher v. Stone, 15 Okla. 130, 79 P. 771; Fortune v. Parks et al., 29 Okla. 698, 119 P. 134; E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank, 39 Okla. 786, 136 P. 744. The certificate under consideration, measured by this......