Fowler v. State, 83-835

Decision Date25 November 1983
Docket NumberNo. 83-835,83-835
PartiesTimothy Leroy FOWLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Timothy Leroy Fowler, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

The prior decision and the mandate issued in this cause are hereby withdrawn, 1 and Fowler's motion for post-conviction relief is granted pursuant to State v. Green, 421 So.2d 508 (Fla.1982) and Grice v. State, 428 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

In Green, the Supreme Court held that "if a judge wishes to retain jurisdiction, a defendant must be advised, prior to pleading guilty or nolo contendere, that the court can retain jurisdiction over a part of the sentence." 421 So.2d at 510. In this case, Fowler has alleged that he was not informed of the possibility of retention prior to pleading guilty, and the state has not shown otherwise.

Accordingly, the cause is remanded for the trial court to either strike the retention of jurisdiction or allow Fowler to withdraw his guilty plea. As a consequence of our action in this case, Fowler's petition for habeas corpus for belated review in Case No. 83-1418 is moot.

DECISION and MANDATE WITHDRAWN; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.

1 The mandate was issued on August 12, 1983, during the current term of court; therefore, this court has jurisdiction to recall it. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Judges of the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, 405 So.2d 980 (Fla.1981); § 35.10, Fla.Stat. (1981) (regular terms of district courts of appeal to commence on the second Tuesday in January and July).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Harmon v. Barton
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 20 d2 Fevereiro d2 1990
    ...e.g., Murray v. State, 469 So.2d 940 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985); Stanley v. State, 501 So.2d 90 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1987); Fowler v. State, 443 So.2d 125 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983). The state court concluded that, consistent with state law, Harmon was procedurally barred from pursuing his claim becaus......
  • Schmidt v. State, 83-866
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 d2 Março d2 1985
    ...plea to stand, or allow appellant to withdraw his nolo plea. Mrozowski v. State, 444 So.2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Fowler v. State, 443 So.2d 125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Crawford v. State, 438 So.2d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA Remanded with directions. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT