Fowler v. Turner

Decision Date18 December 1945
Citation157 Fla. 529,26 So.2d 792
PartiesFOWLER et al. v. TURNER et al.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

On Rehearing June 21, 1946.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1946.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Richard H. Hunt judge.

Hall & Hedrick of Miami, for appellants.

John J. Lindsey, Allen Clements, Grady C. Harris, all of Miami, and Keen & O'Kelley, of Tallahassee, for appellees.

CHAPMAN, Chief Justice.

The record in this case discloses that Dade County, Florida, has ten special tax school districts and the enrollment of pupils in attendance for the school year of 1944-1945, in the several districts thereof aggregated 41,908 pupils. The amount approved by the Budget Commission and the Board of Public Instruction for the support and maintenance and other costs of the public schools of Dade County for the year 1945-1946 was fixed at the total sum of $9,619,911. The assessed valuation of taxable property situated in Dade County for the year 1945, as estimated by a deputy Tax Assessor, is the sum of $551,240,480. The County has a population of 315.138 and covers an area of approximately 2207 square miles.

The assessed valuation of the taxable property in each of the ten special tax school districts and the enrollment of pupils in each district for the school year 1944-1945 are, viz.:

Assessed Valuation

of taxable Peak Enrollment

property in each of pupils in each

District district (Homesteads district (5th

No. omitted) Month)

-------------------- -----------------

2 $171,453,803.00 20,955

3 30,004,341.00 8,762

4 15,596,508.00 1,973

5 23,902,957.00 2,729

6 4,847,602.00 845

7 3,912,728.00 1,061

9 3,541,874.00 802

12 1,845,421.00 391

13 4,676,977.00 165

14 174,760,617.00 4,225

The bonded debt of the special tax school districts, with unexpended funds derived from the sale of bonds of the respective school districts of Dade County, are, viz.:

District Bonded Unexpended

Debt Balance

--------------- -------------

Disrtict No. 2 $6,269,000.00 $1,568,723.67

District No. 3 737,000.00 None

District No. 4 416,000.00 238,202.70

District No. 5 592,000.00 None

District No. 6 73,000.00 None

District No. 7 93,000.00 None

District No. 9 29,000.00 None

District No. 12 No Bonds

District No. 13 60,000.00 None

District No. 14 666,000.00 None

Chapter 23226 Special Acts of 1945, Laws of Florida, provides for the consolidation of all the special tax school districts of Dade County into one or a single district, making the boundaries, after consolidation, coextensive with Dade County. The election of three trustees for the consolidated District No. 1 is provided for, and the terms of the Act make the single District primarily liable for all the bonds and other obligations of the ten special tax school districts so consolidated. The Act is as follows:

'An Act Relating to and Providing for the Consolidation of All the School Districts of Dade County Into One School District and Making the Boundaries of said Consolidated District Co-extensive with Dade County and Providing for a Referendum Election to Determine When and if Same Shall Take Effect.

'Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

'Section 1. All school districts of Dade County shall be consolidated into one such district to be known as 'School District No. 1' and the boundaries of said 'District No. 1' shall be co-extensive with the boundaries of the County and subject to all general law relative to school districts.

'Section 2. Upon the taking effect hereof, all property and assets of the several school districts shall become the property of the said 'School District No. 1' and said district shall be primarily liable for all the bonds and other obligations of the several districts so consolidated and subject to be taxed for the payment thereof; and such consolidation shall in no wise impair the security of any bonds then outstanding.

'Section 3. The three trustees for said 'School District No. 1' shall be elected by the qualified electors of said County at the time and place prescribed by or fixed pursuant to law but not more than one trustee shall come from any one district for which a county commissioner is provided for by law. The persons qualified to hold such office and receiving the greater number of votes cast for election of trustees shall serve for the ensuing two (2) years as trustees for said School District.

'Section 4. No tax that shall have been levied or assessed prior to the time when the provisions hereof shall be of full force and effect shall be hereby impaired.

'Section 5. Insofar as applicable and insofar as consistent with the provisions hereof and when not in conflict herewith the provisions of the general law of this State relating to school districts and to the consolidation of school districts shall be applicable to said 'School District No. 1' upon this Act taking final effect by the submission and approval hereof on referendum to the qualified voters of the County.

'Section 6. The Board of Public Instruction of Dade County shall forthwith call and hold and canvass the returns of an election by the qualified electors of such county for their approval or disapproval hereof, which elections shall be after such County Board shall have published notice of the election once each week for four (4) successive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation throughout the county; and the ballot at said election shall in a short and simple form fairly present the matter to be voted on as determined by the Board of Public Instruction of said County.

'Section 7. In the event of the approval hereof upon a referendum election all of Dade County shall become one school district as of January 1st following the date of election and the trustees thereof shall take office on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January following said election.

'Section 8. This Act shall take effect upon it being approved by a majority of those qualified electors of the County voting at an election to be called and held by the County Board of Public Instruction for Dade County.

'Became a law without the Governor's approval.

'Filed in Office Secretary of State June 11, 1945.'

Proceedings were instituted in the Circuit Court of Dade County for the purpose of obtaining a declaratory decree, as provided by statute, as to the validity and constitutionality of the aforesaid Act--it being asserted by plaintiffs below, the appellants here, that the Act is invalid, void and unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable. Five questions agreed by counsel of record to be controlling are posed for adjudication by this Court.

The first question posed here for adjudication is, viz.: Do the provisions of Special Act, Chapter 23226, Laws of Florida, 1945, providing for the consolidation of the ten school districts in Dade County into one school district and further providing that upon the taking effect of said Act all property and assets of the several school districts shall become the property of the said school district No. 1, and said district shall be primarily liable for all bonds and other obligations of the several districts as consolidated and subject to be taxed for the payment thereof, violate the following constitutional provisions:

(A) Section 13, Article XII--prohibiting the diversion of school district funds.

(B) Section 17, Article XII--requiring the levying of a special tax for the payment of interest and the principal of bonds within the special tax school district voting in favor of the issuance thereof.

(C) Section 12, Declaration of Rights and the 5th and 14th Amendments of the Federal Constitution--prohibiting the taking of property without due process of law.

This Court in the consideration of a Statute presumes that the Legislature intended a valid and constitutional enactment. In deference to our legislative department of government this Court will uphold a statute against the constitutional attacks unless it is clearly made to appear beyond a reasonable doubt that the Act is unconstitutional. Where a statute is susceptible of two constructions, one of which leads to the conclusion that the same is void and the other that it is a valid Act, then the construction that will save the Act must be adopted. Hiers v. Mitchell, 95 Fla. 345, 116 So. 81.

The Constitution of Florida is not a grant of power to the Legislature, but only a limitation upon legislation, and, unless legislation be clearly contrary to some expressed or implied prohibition found in the Constitution, the courts are without authority to declare a legislative Act invalid. Jordan v. Duval, 68 Fla. 48, 66 So. 298. The public school fund of a county cannot be used to satisfy the obligations of a special school district, nor can the funds of the latter be used to satisfy the debts of the public schools of a county. The law considers and recognizes them as separate and distinct school funds. Funds of one special tax school district cannot be appropriated to the obligations of another special tax school district. Board of Public Instruction of of Pinellas County v. Knight & Wall Co., 100 Fla. 1649, 132 So. 644.

It appears by the record that Special Tax School District No. 2 has a bonded debt of $6,269,000 with an unexpended balance of $1,568,723.67, while Tax School District No. 4 has a bonded debt of $416,000, with an unexpended balance of $238,202.70; and School Tax District No. 12 has neither bonds outstanding nor money to its credit. Section 2 of the Act provides that 'all property and assets of the several school districts shall become the property of the said 'School District No. 1' and said district shall be primarily liable for all the bonds and other obligations of the several districts so...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Advisory Opinion to Governor, In re
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 21, 1971
    ...not a granting instrument; rather, it, like all state constitutions, merely limits the sovereign powers of the state. Fowler v. Turner, 1945, 157 Fla. 529, 26 So.2d 792. Any limitation must be express and unambiguous, however, for it is a 'fundamental principle that 'the terms of an organic......
  • Monington v. Turner, s. 41321
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 21, 1971
    ...when needed. Moreover, it is always to be remembered the Constitution is a limitation upon legislative power, not a grant. Fowler v. Turner, 157 Fla. 529, 26 So.2d 792. Therefore, since there is no prohibition against the creation of the additional judgeship under the related conditions and......
  • Yearwood v. Glenn
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1946
  • Board of Public Instruction of Orange County v. Britt
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1946
    ...fundamental questions raised by the certification have been set at rest by the latest pronouncement of this court in Fowler et al. v. Turner et al., Fla., 26 So.2d 792. Although that case arose under a special or local pertaining to Dade County, Florida, Chapter 23226, Laws of Florida, Spec......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT