Fox v. Gibbs
Decision Date | 02 December 1893 |
Citation | 86 Me. 87,29 A. 940 |
Parties | FOX v. GIBBS et al. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Report from supreme judicial court, Cumberland county.
Bill in equity, heard on bill and answer, brought by Frederick Fox, surviving executor and trustee, to obtain the construction of the residuary clause in the will of Joseph Walker, of Portland, deceased.
From the joint and several answers of the respondents, it appears that the residuary fund remaining in the hands of the executor, after payment of debts and legacies, amounts, at the appraisal, to $225,000; and that the respondents are all heirs at law of said Walker, and are all of them legatees under said will, and have all received the legacies given them thereby.
Answering further, they say "that they are advised and believe, and therefore allege, that the trusts attempted to be created in and by the thirty-seventh item of said will are invalid and void, and that all the said residuary fund descends as undevised property to said respondents," etc. Decree for complainant.
Frederick Fox and Symonds, Snow & Cook, for plaintiff. Nathan & Henry B. Cleaves, Stephen C. Perry, and Henry W. Swasey, for defendant Albert D. Walker. S. C. Strout, H. W. Gage, and C. A. Strout, for other defendants.
PETERS, C. J. Joseph Walker, the testator, dying childless, left a will containing 36 bequests of public and private donations, and ending with the following residuary clause:
Some of the heirs at law of the testator oppose the approbation of this residuary bequest by the court, contending that it is void for its indefiniteness and uncertainty. This objection is not taken, however, by all the counsel for the different contestants.
It is maintained by some writers that the very omission of specification as to persons and objects in a bequest of this kind is a distinctive test of its true charitable character, and that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boyd v. Frost Nat. Bank
...indefinite trusts. Most of the authorities cited by the text writers, and upon which respondents strongly rely, are as follows: Fox v. Gibbs, 86 Me. 87, 29 A. 940. In Maine statutes exist which require accounting of trustees. Chapter 82, §§ 1, 10 and 11, R. S. Maine 1930. 43 Elizabeth is a ......
-
Hadley v. Forsee
...Allen 446; Weber v. Bryant, 161 Mass. 400; Wells v. Doane, 3 Gray 203; Estate of Hinckley, 58 Cal. 457; Everett v. Carr, 59 Me. 325; Fox v. Gibbs, 86 Me. 87; White v. 140 Mass. 351; Brown v. Kelsey, 2 Cush. 243; Claypool v. Norcross, 42 N.J.Eq. 545; In re Stewart's Estate (Wash.), 66 P. 148......
-
Hedin v. Westdala Lutheran Church
... ... uncertainty of the object. ( Gossett v. Swinney, (C ... C. A., 8th Cir., Mo. 1931) 53 F.2d 772; Saltonstall v ... Sanders, 11 Allen, (93 Mass.) 446 (1865); Weber v ... Bryant 161 Mass. 400, 37 N.E. 203; Everett v ... Carr, 59 Me. 325; Fox v. Gibbs, 86 Me. 87, 29 ... A. 940; Dunn v. Morse, 109 Me. 254, 83 A. 795.) ... It is ... well settled that a man may possess testamentary capacity, ... although unable to transact business. ( Schwarz v ... Taeger, 44 Idaho 625, 258 P. 1082; In re ... Sexton's Estate, 199 Cal. 759, 251 ... ...
-
Sandusky v. Sandusky
... ... St. 310; Stevens' ... Estate, 200 Pa. St. 322; Tyler's Estate, 208 Pa. St. 65; ... Atty. Genl. v. Wallace's Devisee, 7 B. Mon. 611; ... Kinney v. Kinney's Ex., 86 Ky. 610; ... Crawford's Heirs v. Thomas, 54 S.W. 197; ... Beckwith v. St. Phillips, 69 Ga. 564; Fox v ... Gibbs, 86 Me. 87; Simpson v. Welcome, 72 Me ... 496; Everett v. Carr, 59 Me. 325; People ex rel ... v. Cogswell, 113 Cal. 129; Am. Tract. Soc. v ... Atwater, 30 Ohio St. 77; (27 A. R. 422); Mannix v ... Purcell, 46 Ohio St. 102; Land Com. v. Wadhams, ... 11 L. R. A. (Ore.) 210; Howard v. Am ... ...