Foxworth v. Wainwright
| Decision Date | 07 October 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 33592,33592 |
| Parties | William FOXWORTH, Petitioner, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
William Foxworth, in pro. per.
James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
We have this matter for consideration upon Foxworth's original petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the respondent's return.
Foxworth, at the age of 14 years, together with several other minors, was indicted, tried by jury and found guilty of murder in the first degree. On November 29, 1944, pursuant to a mercy recommendation, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. In February, 1964, Foxworth moved in the circuit court to have his conviction vacated under our Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. On March 10, 1964, the circuit judge, after examining the court's records, denied the motion. The petitioner thereupon filed an affidavit of insolvency and a motion to have counsel appointed to assist him in appealing the adverse order on his Rule 1 motion. On April 6, 1964, the circuit judge entered an order denying the adjudication of insolvency and request for appointment of counsel, pursuant to a finding 'that the appeal is totally lacking in merit.' The clerk of the trial court thereupon refused to file the petitioner's notice of appeal and other appeal papers without payment of filing costs in the absence of an adjudication of insolvency.
The petitioner was thereby confronted with a dilemma. The judge refused to adjudicate his insolvency, not because he was solvent but rather because of the view that the appeal from the Rule 1 order was frivolous. The clerk refused to file the appeal papers without payment of costs because there was no order adjudicating the petitioner insolvent.
In this situation Foxworth applied to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. He alleged that the state had effectively used its processes to prevent him from appealing. He further alleged various organic defects in his original conviction. Our concern was generated by the denial of the order of insolvency on the ground that the trial judge deemed the appeal frivolous. We have held that the denial of an application for an adjudication of insolvency can have the effect of illegally precluding appellate review. Loy v. State, Fla., 74 So.2d 650. Under Section 924.17, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the petitioner was entitled to an adjudication on the merits of his motion for a determination of his insolvency. Instead of passing on the claim of insolvency, the trial judge denied the motion because of his view that the prospective appeal was frivolous. The petitioner had a right to present his matter to the proper appellate court. If he was in fact insolvent, as he would likely be after twenty years of imprisonment, he was entitled to have this fact settled so that he could at least file his appeal papers without payment of costs. Section 924.17, supra. With reference to the appointment of counsel to assist in appealing from the adverse order on the Rule 1 motion, the trial judge acted within his sound discretion in denying the request. We have held that in these collateral attacks on criminal judgments, the obvious frivolity of the appeal may be a proper ground for denying state-appointed counsel. State v. Weeks, 166 So.2d 898, opinion filed March 4, 1964.
We issued the writ in the instant case because by the time the matter reached us the petitioner's appeal period had expired and he was without other adequate remedies. W...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Avery, 87-0270
...of helpful context of briefs in another appeal to flesh out what the opinion in that case did not reveal). See also Foxworth v. Wainwright, 167 So.2d 868 (Fla.1964); Irvin v. Chapman, 75 So.2d 591 (Fla.1954); and Collingsworth v. Mayo, 37 So.2d 696 Circuit Judge Marvin Mounts eloquently sai......
-
Tribbitt v. State
...to the case before it for consideration." See McNish v. State , 47 Fla. 69, 36 So. 176, 176 (1904) ; see also Foxworth v. Wainwright , 167 So. 2d 868, 870 (Fla. 1964) ; Harrison v. State , 198 So. 3d 765, 767 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; Cooper v. State , 845 So. 2d 312, 313 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ......
-
Foxworth v. Wainwright
...denied, and he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Florida, which also denied relief. Foxworth v. Wainwright, Fla., 1964, 167 So.2d 868. He later filed another motion to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence, this time in the Florida c......
-
Foxworth v. State
...by the Circuit Court, instituted habeas corpus proceeding in this Court. The petition was found to be without merit. Foxworth v. Wainwright, 167 So.2d 868 (Fla.1964). On July 22, 1969, Foxworth filed a motion to vacate and set aside judgment and sentence in the Circuit Court of Jackson Coun......