Francisco v. Hatch

Decision Date10 January 1905
Citation124 Wis. 220,101 N.W. 1135
PartiesFRANCISCO v. HATCH.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sauk County; E. Ray Stevens, Judge. Action by Grant D. Francisco against William H. Hatch. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed by divided court.

*1135R. E. Noyes, for appellant.

Dithmar & Carow and Grotophorst, Evans & Thomas, for respondent.

CASSODAY, C. J.

This cause was tried at the circuit before Mr. Justice SIEBECKER, now a member of this court. The other members of this court find themselves equally divided on the question of the admission of certain evidence, and this necessarily results in an affirmance of the judgment. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

SIEBECKER, J., took no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Smith v. Kleynerman
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 21 Marzo 2017
    ...N.W. 213 (1880) (on appeal).4. State ex rel. Dietrich v. Patterson , 119 Wis. 52, 96 N.W. 1135 (1903) (on appeal).5. Francisco v. Hatch , 124 Wis. 220, 101 N.W. 1135 (1905) (on appeal).6. Swenson v. Flint , 123 Wis. 613, 101 N.W. 1135 (1905) (on appeal).7. Montayne v. N. Electrical Mfg. Co.......
  • Hagenah v. Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 17 Junio 1908
    ...judgment below. Jacobs v. Queen Ins. Co., 123 Wis. 608, 101 N. W. 1090;Swenson v. Flint, 123 Wis. 613, 101 N. W. 1135;Francisco v. Hatch, 124 Wis. 220, 101 N. W. 1135;Cook v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co., 125 Wis. 528, 103 N. W. 1097. The judgment of the court below is ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT