Francois v. State, s. 65--588
| Decision Date | 14 June 1966 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 65--588,65--589,s. 65--588 |
| Citation | 188 So.2d 7 |
| Parties | Kerry FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. Leroy WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Ellis Rubin and Aram P. Goshgarian, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry N. Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
The above cases were consolidated for purposes of appellate review in this court. Both of the appellants seek review of an adverse jury verdict finding them guilty of first degree murder with a recommendation of mercy. Following an adjudication and sentence to life imprisonment, they bring this appeal.
The record reveals that these appellants (who were sixteen years of age at the time involved), together with another minor, participated in a robbery which resulted in the death of the intended victim as a result of action taken by the third participant with a deadly weapon. The parties were apprehended immediately after the commission of the felony murder and delivered to the custody of the juvenile authorities of Dade County. While in the custody of that court, statements implicating them in the felony murder were taken from them and thereafter, pursuant to the provisions of § 39.02(6), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the juvenile court held a hearing and waived jurisdiction in favor of the circuit court. Subsequently, the appellants were indicted by the grand jury for first degree murder and brought to trial. At the time of the trial, the confessions rendered while in the custody and control of the juvenile court were entered into evidence over objections. 1
Upon this appeal, the appellants have preserved by proper assignment of error and points several alleged errors in the rulings of the trial court. However, with the exception of the admission in evidence of the confessions, we find no merit in the contentions made by the appellants.
We hold that it was error for the trial court to admit the confessions taken from the appellants while they were in the care, custody and control of the juvenile court, because while in the care, custody and control of that court they were not entitled to the constitutional protection of due process of law as accorded an adult. See: In Re T.W.P., Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 507; State v. Dennis, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 12 (opinion filed April 12, 1966). 2 Therefore, if they were not entitled to these protections at the time their confessions were given to the juvenile authorities, then certainly the fruit of this interrogation should not be used against them when placed on trial for their lives in the circuit court. In this regard, see the following authorities: Harling v. United States, 1961, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 174, 295 F.2d 161; Edwards v. United States 1964, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 330 F.2d 849. See, also: Kent v. United States, 1964, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 378, 343 F.2d 247, (reversed on other grounds) 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 16 L.Ed.2d 84.
For the reasons above stated, the verdicts, adjudications and sentences here under review be and the same are hereby reversed and set aside. And, the appellants be and they are hereby remanded to the Circuit Court in and for the Fleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County for a new trial on the original indictments.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
The holding that it was error to admit the confessions taken from the appellants while they were in the care, custody and control of the juvenile court appears to me to presume that such confessions were not voluntary. The rule of law is well established that the test as to the verity of a confession is whether of not it was freely and voluntarily made. Montgomery v. State, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 331, 334.
The determination as to the voluntariness of a confession must be predicated upon the totality of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Walker v. State of Florida
... ... The Florida Supreme Court entertained a petition for certiorari, reversed the district court, and reinstated the conviction. State v. Francois, 197 So.2d 492, Fla.1967. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Walker v. Florida, 390 U.S. 982, 88 S.Ct. 1102, 19 L.Ed.2d 1279, 1968 ... ...
-
State v. Arbeiter
... ... 666. See also People v. Lara, 67 Cal.2d 365, 62 Cal.Rptr. 586, 432 P.2d 202 ... In State v. Francois, 197 So.2d 492, the Florida Supreme Court quashed an opinion of the District Court of Appeals in the same case (Walker v. State, 188 So.2d 7) which ... ...
-
Walker v. State of Florida
...Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 1 See also Francois v. State, 188 So.2d 7 (Fla.D.C.A., 1966); State v. Francois, 197 So.2d 492 (Fla., 1967), cert. den. Walker v. Florida, 390 U.S. 982, 88 S.Ct. 1102, 19 L.Ed.2d 127......
-
State v. Maloney
...while he is within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court to be used in a subsequent criminal proceeding. See in accord, Francois v. State, 188 So.2d 7 (Fla.App.1966). Perhaps the most meaningful language in the above quotation is the court's use of the phrase 'juvenile proceeding'. We thin......