Frank v. Levine, 63-390
| Decision Date | 21 January 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 63-390,63-390 |
| Citation | 159 So.2d 665 |
| Parties | Robert R. FRANK, Appellant, v. Hy LEVINE, Lewis Marrow and Dana Marrow, his wife, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Frank & Strelkow, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Dorothea M. B. Vermorel, Hollywood, for appellees.
Before CARROLL, HORTON and HENDRY, JJ.
Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint. The action was at law for a deficiency following a foreclosure of mortgage. Defendants moved to dismiss on three grounds, (1) that the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, (2) that the 'cause of action is res judicata' and (3) that plaintiff had waived his action and was estopped to bring an action at law.
The question presented is whether the complaint stated a cause of action. We hold that it did, and that it was error to dismiss the cause. The contention of want of jurisdiction was without merit. A right of action at law for a deficiency resulting from a mortgage foreclosure sale is expressly conferred by statute. § 702.06, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Exceptional circumstances which could preclude the action if they existed were not disclosed on the complaint. Res judicata, waiver and estoppel are affirmative defenses. Those defenses and any others available under the facts of the case including equitable defenses should be pleaded in answer to the complaint. Hough v. Menses, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 410, 412; Stone v. Stone, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 352; Nunez v. Alford, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 208. Cf. Belle Mead Development Corporation v. Reed, 114 Fla. 300, 153 So. 843.
In dismissing the complaint at law for a mortgage foreclosure deficiency, notwithstanding statutory authority for such actions at law, the trial judge may have been motivated by an assumption that equitable considerations which could limit recovery of a deficiency when sought in equity in a foreclosure suit, 1 were not available as equitable defenses or partial defenses in a law action for such a deficiency. However, equitable defenses may be pleaded in law actions (rule 1.8(g), Fla. R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.), and there would appear to be no reason why equitable considerations sufficient to limit a deficiency award in equity should not serve equally when pleaded and proved in an action at law to recover a mortgage foreclosure sale deficiency.
Accordingly the order of dismissal is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Wells, 25794-25796.
...sound and sufficient reasons for such actions." Galloway v. Musgrave, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 846, 851. See also Frank v. Levine, Fla. App., 1964, 159 So.2d 665. The appeals of the United States, which we have consolidated for opinion purposes, are based on two contentions. First, it is urg......
-
Frumkes v. Mortgage Guarantee Corp.
...671 (opinion on rehearing); Atlantic Shores Corporation v. Zetterlund, 103 Fla. 761, 138 So. 50, 53-54. But as was held in Frank v. Levine, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 665, equitable considerations which could have been urged in opposition to a proper and timely application for deficiency decre......
-
First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Broward County v. Consolidated Development Corp.
...that argument should be heard on the matter because of apparent conflict with decisions of this court we will enumerate: Frank v. Levine, Fla.App., 159 So.2d 665; Reid v. Miami Studio Properties, Inc., 139 Fla. 246, 190 So. 505; McLarty v. Foremost Dairies, Inc., Fla., 57 So.2d 434; Luke v.......
-
Peterson v. Sutton, 69--266
...Kurkjian v. Fish Carburetor Corporation, supra. See also Frumkes v. Mortgage Guarantee Corp., Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 738; Frank v. Levine, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 665. ...
-
Chapter 19-3 Calculation of Deficiency Amounts
...decree in a foreclosure suit, may be asserted with similar purpose and effect in a law action for deficiency"); Frank v. Levine, 159 So. 2d 665, 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) ("there would appear to be no reason why equitable considerations sufficient to limit a deficiency award in equity should n......
-
Chapter 20-3 Calculation of Deficiency Amounts
...decree in a foreclosure suit, may be asserted with similar purpose and effect in a law action for deficiency"); Frank v. Levine, 159 So. 2d 665, 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) ("there would appear to be no reason why equitable considerations sufficient to limit a deficiency award in equity should n......