Frank v. Snow

Citation6 Wyo. 42,43 P. 78
PartiesFRANK v. SNOW ET AL
Decision Date15 January 1896
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

6 Wyo. 42 at 55.

Original Opinion of November 19, 1895, Reported at: 6 Wyo. 42.

Rehearing denied.

CONAWAY, JUSTICE. GROESBECK, C. J., concurs.

OPINION

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

CONAWAY, JUSTICE.

It is urged on behalf of defendants in error that evidence that Edgar P. Snow negotiated the loan for which he and Elizabeth Snow executed their note and mortgage as principals, and that he received the money, is sufficient to support a finding by the trial court that plaintiff in error had notice that Elizabeth Snow really executed the note and mortgage as surety for Edgar P. Snow. Such is not our opinion. Such facts are consistent with suretyship or non-suretyship, and furnish no intimation as to which is the fact, or that the written instruments are different from what they purport to be.

The order made on the former hearing will not be changed.

Rehearing denied.

GROESBECK, C. J., concurs.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT