Frankel v. Berman
| Decision Date | 26 April 1960 |
| Citation | 199 N.Y.S.2d 261,10 A.D.2d 838 |
| Parties | Jacob FRANKEL and Benjamin Ringelheim d/b/u the firm name and style of Marcy Do-Nut and Crullers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David BERMAN d/b/u the firm name and style of Berman Bakers Equipment, Defendant-Respondent. David BERMAN d/b/u the firm name and style of Berman Bakers Equipment, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anita ISRAEL as Executrix of Louis Israel, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Anita ISRAEL as Executrix of Louis Israel, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Saul WOLSHINE and Charles Kenigel, copartners d/b/u the firm name and style of Egyptian Polishing and Plating Works, Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Sol Dubow, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Stanley L. Gluck, New York City, of counsel (Kaufman & Gluck, New York City, attys.), for respondent Anita Israel.
Nathan R. Shapiro, New York City, for fourth-party defendants-respondents.
Before BOTEIN, P. J., and BREITEL, RABIN, M. M. FRANK and VALENTE, JJ.
No appeal having been taken by the defendant, the determination of the Municipal Court insofar as it granted judgment to the plaintiffs against the defendant should not have been disturbed. Plaintiffs' proof failed to establish the allegations of the complaint or of the cause of action for breach of warranty asserted in the motion to conform the pleadings to the proof. Accordingly, the third-party complaint should be dismissed and that portion of the judgment of the Municipal Court which dismissed the fourth-party complaint should be reinstated. In view of the disposition of the judgment against the defendant, the counterclaim should also be dismissed.
The determination of the Appellate Term directing a new trial should be unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, the subsequent order of the Municipal Court reversed and the motion to correct and amend the decision denied, and the prior judgment of the Municipal Court is modified so as to dismiss the third-party complaint and the counterclaim and, as so modified, reinstated, with costs of this appeal to the third-party defendant against the third-party plaintiff, and to the fourth-party defendant against the fourth-party plaintiff, and without costs to the plaintiffs-appellants.
All concur.
Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously reversed on the law, on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. F. C. C.
...(Ky.1961); Ulrich v. Mpls. Boxing & Wrestling Club, Inc., 268 Minn. 328, 335-336, 129 N.W.2d 288, 294 (1964); Frankel v. Berman, 10 App.Div.2d 838, 199 N.Y.S.2d 261 (1960); Modine Mfg. Co. v. North East Ind. School Dist., 503 S.W.2d 833, 845-46 (Tex.Civ.App.1973); 5B C.J.S. Appeal & Error §......
-
Hecht v. City of New York
...143; Kennis v. Sherwood, 82 A.D.2d 847, 848, 439 N.Y.S.2d 962; Pinder v. Gromet, 10 A.D.2d 977, 978, 202 N.Y.S.2d 345; Frankel v. Berman, 10 A.D.2d 838, 199 N.Y.S.2d 261; Strecker v. Kew Gardens Realty Assoc., 230 App.Div. 714, 242 N.Y.S.2d 898; cf. Matter of Burk, 298 N.Y. 450, 455, 84 N.E......
-
Mixon v. TBV, Inc.
...Andrews Inst. for Girls, 192 N.Y. 382, 386-389 ; Kennis v. Sherwood, 82 A.D.2d 847, 848 ; Pinder v. Gromet, 10 A.D.2d 977, 978 ; Frankel v. Berman, 10 A.D.2d 838 ; Strecker v. Kew Gardens Realty Assoc., 230 App.Div. 714 ; cf. Matter of Burk, 298 N.Y. 450, 455 ). The corollary to this rule i......
-
Rosenbaum v. Lefrak Corp.
...533; Weinstein-Korn-Miller,p 5701.25. (The fact that Lefrak served a notice of appeal distinguishes this case from Frankel v. Berman, 10 A.D.2d 838, 199 N.Y.S.2d 261; see also Rome Cable Corp. v. Tanney, 21 A.D.2d 342, 250 N.Y.S.2d In its brief in this Court Lefrak made no argument on the q......