Franklin v. State
| Citation | 237 S.E.2d 425,143 Ga.App. 3 |
| Decision Date | 01 July 1977 |
| Docket Number | 3,Nos. 1,No. 53600,2,53600,s. 1 |
| Parties | C. F. FRANKLIN v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Chambers, Siefferman, Robinson & Cooper, Floyd E. Siefferman, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joseph J. Drolet, Donald J. Stein, R. David Petersen, Asst. Dist. Attys., Atlanta, for appellee.
The defendant was indicted for violation of the Controlled Substances Act after being found in possession of nearly three thousand pounds of marijuana. The defendant moved to suppress the evidence as the fruit of an illegal arrest. He now appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his motion to suppress.
The defendant was the pilot of a plane which was importing marijuana into the United States. The plane became lost in bad weather and landed at Anniston, Alabama. Before leaving the Anniston airport, the defendant aroused the authorities' suspicion as to the nature of his cargo, and local police attempted unsuccessfully to stop him before he hastily returned to the skies, bound for Atlanta.
Georgia authorities were notified of the plane's approach, and a radio call went out to Fulton County police officers near the Charlie Brown Airport to hold the plane for authorities in Alabama.
Police officers arrived at the airport moments before the defendant's plane landed, blocked the taxiway, and, armed with shotguns, awaited the defendant's arrival. When the defendant landed and neared their cars, he was ordered to get out of the plane. While he was doing so, officers saw the marijuana inside the plane and according to their version of the facts, arrested the defendant at that time.
The defendant contends that when his vehicle's motion was blocked by police cars and he was accosted by officers armed with shotguns an arrest had already occurred. It is the State's contention that the defendant was not arrested until after the officers saw his cargo and that the armed blockage of the taxiway amounted merely to an "investigatory stop," as allowed by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Because probable cause for an arrest did not exist until the marijuana was actually spotted inside the plane, we must determine whether sufficient evidence existed for a determination by the trial judge that the defendant's initial confrontation with the police was in the context of a Terry stop.
1. The defendant landed in Anniston in a World War II vintage aircraft of a type known to be regularly used in drug trafficking. He landed without contacting the control tower, as is customary, and drove his aircraft much faster than is normal on the ramp. He refused to disembark from the plane when asked to do so by Anniston police and took off rapidly, without going through the customary aircraft pre-flight checklist. Based on these observations, Anniston police had an articulable suspicion that contraband was present in the aircraft and thus had the right to detain the defendant for questioning under Terry.
The defendant's plane was followed on radar from Anniston to Atlanta. As Fulton County policemen were approaching Charlie Brown Airport, they were notified by radio that the aircraft had dropped off radar at Hartsfield Airport and appeared to have landed. An officer arrived at the Charlie Brown Airport to see a plane make a low sweep without setting down. There is evidence from which the trial judge could find that the defendant's aircraft was sufficiently determined by Fulton County police to be that which departed from Anniston. Because Anniston officials had sufficient cause to stop the plane under Terry, Fulton County police who were notified by radio to hold the plane for Alabama authorities also had sufficient reason to effect a Terry stop. Silas v. State, 133 Ga.App. 560, 211 S.E.2d 609 (1974); Quinn v. State, 132 Ga.App. 395, 208 S.E.2d 263 (1974).
2. Time of arrest is a question of fact which depends upon an evaluation of the testimony by the trial judge. Rios v. United States, 364 U.S. 253, 262, 80 S.Ct. 1431, 4 L.Ed.2d 1688 (1960). There is evidence to support the trial judge's finding that an arrest did not occur until the police saw marijuana in plain view. Johnson v. State, 233 Ga. 58, 209 S.E.2d 629 (1974).
Blocking the plane with police cars was a reasonable manner of stopping it under the circumstances, considering the possibility of flight by the defendant in a highly mobile aircraft. An investigatory stop is not automatically an arrest simply because an officer is armed with a shotgun. United States v. Worthington, 544 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Maslanka, 501 F.2d 208, 213 n. 10 (5th Cir. 1974). It is often necessary for the police to approach a person with a drawn weapon in a suspiciously dangerous situation in order to protect the physical well-being of both police officers and the public. In fact, in a situation very similar to that sub judice, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently held that officers acted reasonably in stopping a pilot suspected of transporting marijuana by blocking his plane and ordering him at riflepoint to disembark. United States v. Worthington, supra. The officers' actions in the case at bar in merely holding shotguns is certainly less offensive than in Worthington, where a high-powered rifle was aimed at the pilot.
The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution prohibit only unreasonable searches and seizures. Is a seizure unreasonable simply because the police have taken the precaution to arm themselves in light of unknown danger? We are not prepared so to hold. If we were to reach a contrary result, law enforcement officers would be required to risk their lives by not drawing weapons until drawn upon, unless a hasty legal analysis convinced them that probable cause existed for an arrest.
From Holtzendorf v. State, 125 Ga.App. 747, 750, 188 S.E.2d 879, 881 (1972), the defendant quotes, "It must be recognized that whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person." With this statement we have no quarrel; the defendant was "seized" by Fulton County officers when his aircraft's passage was blocked. The Holtzendorf quote was taken verbatim from Terry v. Ohio, supra, another case where a defendant was seized. However, the court in Terry proceeded to hold that the seizure was not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment as we have done here. Therefore, the quote from Holtzendorf does not support the defendant's contention that he was necessarily illegally arrested.
The holding of this court in Kelly v. State, 129 Ga.App. 131, 198 S.E.2d 910 (1973), does not conflict with our finding that no arrest occurred prior to discovery of the marijuana. In Division 2 of Kelly this court simply held that there was no "articulable suspicion" to support a Terry stop of the defendant's automobile.
Judgment affirmed.
SMITH, J., disqualified.
I concur in the dissent of Judge Shulman. However, I must also dissent from the First Division of the opinion. It should be noted that the majority based its opinion on the "two-step" premise: (1) "Anniston police had an articulable suspicion that contraband was present in the aircraft and thus had the right to detain the defendant for questioning under Terry (Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889) . . . (thus) (2) Because Anniston officials had sufficient cause to stop the plane under Terry, Fulton County police who were notified by radio to hold the plane for Alabama authorities also had sufficient reason to effect a Terry stop." (Emphasis supplied.)
Returning to the Anniston Airport, I observe that it was the FAA Traffic Control Specialist, Mr. Bennett, whose "suspicion" was aroused and not the suspicion of the police. Mr. Bennett stated: Mr. Bennett admitted that the aircraft was not required by any rule, regulation or law, to call him.
When the police arrived at the airport they reported to the terminal and Mr. Bennett directed them to the aircraft which had parked on the "ramp underneath the only burning white light that we have." Mr. Bennett observed ". . . one figure disembarked from the aircraft and went out to the police and apparently held some conversation with them . . . the figures turned and one went back toward the aircraft . . . (Mr. Bennett) reentered the building . . . (and) heard the aircraft engine start . . . saw it taxi rapidly to the end of the runway without any run-up procedure and immediately start taking off." He also stated that it was a "pilot option" to use a "rolling takeoff" as opposed to a "dead stop" takeoff.
Officer Hudson of the Oxford Police Department of Anniston, Alabama, was the policeman who responded to the FAA call. He was asked: He was directed to the airplane and testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Watkins v. State
...486 F.2d 614, 616-17 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 959, 94 S.Ct. 1488, 39 L.Ed.2d 574 (1973); Franklin v. State, 143 Ga.App. 3, 237 S.E.2d 425, 426 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 950, 98 S.Ct. 1575, 55 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978); State v. Ogata, 58 Haw. 514, 572 P.2d 1222, 1224 (1......
-
Hardwick v. State
...him under the control of pointed weapons. As to this writer's opinion of the force sufficient to effect an arrest, see Franklin v. State, 143 Ga.App. 3, 13, 237 S.E.2d 425. Even had the issue of consent been raised, there is some doubt as to whether valid consent could be given under the ci......
-
State v. Hughes
...not every detention is an arrest...." Radowick v. State, supra 145 Ga.App. at 238(3), 244 S.E.2d 346. See also Franklin v. State, 143 Ga.App. 3, 5(2), 237 S.E.2d 425 (1977), holding that "[a]n investigatory stop is not automatically an arrest simply because an officer is armed with a shotgu......
-
State v. Thomason
...of the motorist. Cf. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 663, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1401, 59 L.Ed.2d 660, 673 (1979); Franklin v. State, 143 Ga.App. 3, 4(2), 237 S.E.2d 425 (1977) (cert. den., 435 U.S. 950, 98 S.Ct. 1575, 55 L.Ed.2d 799). "A police officer has a limited right to an investigative sto......