Franks v. G & H Real Estate Holding Corp., 2004-00554.
Decision Date | 28 March 2005 |
Docket Number | 2004-00554. |
Parties | LIZZY FRANKS et al., Respondents, v. G & H REAL ESTATE HOLDING CORP. et al., Respondents, and ECKERD CORP., Doing Business as GENOVESE DRUG STORE, #5514, et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the motion of the defendant Eckerd Corp., doing business as Genovese Drug Store, #5514, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it and substituting therefor a provision granting that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the appellant Eckerd Corp., doing business as Genovese Drug Store, #5514, payable by the defendants North Shore True Value Hardware and Mr. China, Inc., doing business as Mr. China Bridal Registry, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against that defendant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The plaintiffs commenced this action, inter alia, seeking to recover damages for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Lizzy Franks when she tripped and fell into a "water depression" in a shopping center parking lot on Northern Boulevard in Little Neck. The plaintiff alleged that each of the defendants leased and operated a store in the shopping center adjacent to the parking lot, and as such, the defendants were all responsible for its maintenance.
As a general rule, liability for a dangerous condition on real property must be predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use of the property (see Welwood v Association for Children With Down Syndrome, 248 AD2d 707,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bahr v. Airway Cleaners, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 32491(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 9/8/2008), Index No: 11589/06.
...Ltd. Partnership, 36 A.D.3d 849 (2nd Dept. 2007); Morgan v. Chong Kwan Jun, 30 A.D.3d 386 (2nd Dept. 2006); Franks v. G & H Real Estate Holding Corp., 16 A.D.3d 619 (2nd Dept. 2005); DePompo v. Waldbaums Supermarket, Inc., 291 A.D.2d 528 (2nd Dept. 2002); Welwood v. Association for Children......
-
Pozarski v. Brooklyn Bridge Park Corp.
...use of the property’ " ( Futter v. Hewlett Sta.Yogurt, Inc. , 149 AD3d 912, 913, 52 N.Y.S.3d 432, quoting Franks v. G & H Real Estate Holding Corp. , 16 AD3d 619, 620, 793 N.Y.S.2d 61 ; see Basso v. Miller , 40 NY2d 233, 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868 ). ( Knight v. 177 W. 26 Realty,......
-
Futter v. Hewlett Station Yogurt, Inc.
...on real property must be predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use of the property" (Franks v. G & H Real Estate Holding Corp., 16 A.D.3d 619, 620, 793 N.Y.S.2d 61 ; see Ellers v. Horwitz Family Ltd. Partnership, 36 A.D.3d 849, 850, 831 N.Y.S.2d 417 ). Here, the plaintif......
-
Susan Vitiello v. Aldrich Mgmt. Co.
...for Children With Down Syndrome, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 556 (2d Dept. 1998); Franks v. G & H Real Estate Holding Corp., 16 A.D.3d 619, 793 N.Y.S.2d 61 (2d Dept. 2005). As to defendants CVS, without possession, or a right to maintain or control the parking area, they owe no duty ......