Frazier v. McFerren

Decision Date27 April 1964
Citation402 S.W.2d 467,55 Tenn.App. 431
PartiesEmma Jean FRAZIER, Complainant-Appellee, v. John McFERREN, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtTennessee Court of Appeals

R. B. J. Campbelle, Jr., Nashville, for appellant.

John S. Wilder, Somerville, for appellee.

CARNEY, Judge.

The defendant below, John McFerren, has appealed from a decree of the Juvenile Court of Fayette County, Tennessee, adjudging him to be the natural father and therefore liable for the support of a minor child, Angela Kay Frazier, born November 12, 1962, to the complainant, Emma Jean Frazier.

The complainant, Emma Jean Frazier, a citizen and resident of Somerville, Fayette County, Tennessee, testified that she and her husband, William Frank Frazier, of Memphis, Tennessee, separated in November, 1960, in Fayette County, Tennessee, and that she had not had intercourse with him since November, 1960, nor had she been associated with him since that date. Further, she testified that she began having an affair with the defendant, John McFerren, in December, 1961, and which affair continued through February, 1962, and that the said John McFerren was the father of the baby girl, Angela Kay Frazier, born to her on November 12, 1962.

Further, she testified that upon discovering that she was pregnant, she informed the defendant and he brought to her at her home several vials labeled 'quinine sulfate' and suggested that she should take such medicine in an effort to abort or miscarry. She stated that she did not take the medicine because she did not know the proper dosage.

Complainant's husband, William Frank Frazier, of Memphis, testified that they were married in June, 1955, and separated in 1960; he acknowledged that three of the complainant's five children were his. He stated that the first child and the fifth child, namely Angela Kay Frazier, were not his children. The first child was born prior to his marriage to the complainant. He testified that since their separation in the fall of 1960 he had not had intercourse with the complainant nor visited with her nor had she visited with him since that date but that the complainant had written to him and had informed him that she had had a child born to her by the defendant, John McFerren.

The complainant was partially corroborated as to her being seen in the company with the defendant, John McFerren, by several witnesses.

The defendant, John McFerren, operates a grocery store in or near the town of Somerville, Tennessee. He is also president of an organization known as 'Original Fayette County Civic and Welfare League' which apparently is engaged to some extent in the distribution of foodstuffs to needy people. The complainant, Emma Jean Frazier, was employed by the defendant, John McFerren, both as a helper in his grocery store and in operation of the Welfare League in the distribution of food and supplies. Complainant testified that the several acts of intercourse with the defendant occurred on various county roads of Fayette County, oftentimes as he was taking her home from work. The defendant is married.

McFerren denied that he had ever had an affair with the complainant, Emma Jean Frazier; denied that he had ever delivered her any vials of any kind; denied that he had ever taken her home from work except on one or two occasions when he took other employees home at the same time. Defendant offered testimony tending to show that the complainant had been seen parked on country roads in compromissing positions with men other than the defendant.

The trial Judge found the evidence in favor of the complainant and adjudged the defendant, John McFerren, to be the natural father of Angela Kay Frazier. He ordered him to pay all the hospital and doctor's bills incident to the birth of said child; he ordered him to pay the sum of $25.00 per month effective November 12, 1962, for the support and maintenance of said minor child and to pay the solicitor for complainant, Mr. Wilder, the sum of $150.00.

In support of his motion for a new trial the defendant, John McFerren, filed the affidavit of one Willie B. Hardaway a citizen and resident of Fayette County, Tennessee, to the effect that he had been regularly dating the complainant, Emma Jean Frazier, since October, 1961; and that he was the father of the minor child, Angela Kay Frazier; that he had advanced the complainant $3.00 to buy medicine to abort or miscarry and that he had continued to give the complaint money from time to time. Further, he stated that after he heard about the court decree against John McFerren, he volunteered the information to John McFerren that he was the true father of said child and that he was ready and willing to support said child.

The court received an affidavit of Emma Jean Frazier in reply thereto in which she categorically denied all allegations of the affidavit of Willie Hardaway; denied that she even knew Willie B. Hardaway; denied that she had ever knowingly seen or been with him or had any association with him of any kind. The Trial Judge overruled the motion for a new trial and the defendant, John McFerren, has assigned errors in this court on this appeal.

The proceedings were instituted under the provisions of T.C.A. Section 36--222 et seq. which are shown in the Code under the general title 'Bastardy.' These sections of the Code were enacted by Chapter 186 of the Public Acts of 1955 and repealed the former statutes relating to bastardy proceedings.

We copy the pertinent sections of the code as follows:

'36--222. Definitions.--As used in this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

(1) 'Child' means a child born out of lawful wedlock.

(2) 'Mother' means the mother of a child born out of lawful wedlock.

(3) 'Court' shall mean the juvenile court. (Acts 1955, ch. 186, § 1.)'

'36--223. Liability of father of child born out of wedlock.--The father of a child born out of wedlock is liable for the necessary support and education of the child. He is also liable for the child's funeral expenses. He is liable to pay for the expenses of the mother's confinement and recovery, and is also liable to pay such expenses, including counsel fees, in connection with her pregnancy as the court in its discretion may deem proper. (Acts 1955, ch. 186, § 2.)'

'36--227. Conduct of trial.--(1) The trial shall be by the court without a jury unless the defendant shall demand a jury or the judge of his own motion orders, in either of which events the case shall be transferred to the circuit court for jury trial on the issue of paternity, and shall be remanded to the juvenile court upon disposal of that issue if paternity is found. Both the mother and the alleged father shall be competent to testify but the alleged father shall not be compelled to give evidence. If the mother is married, both she and her husband may testify to nonaccess. The court may exclude the general public from the room where proceedings are had, pursuant to this chapter, admitting only persons directly interested in the case, including officers of the court and witnesses.

(2) If the defendant fails to appear, the security for his appearance shall be forfeited and shall be applied upon the order of paternity and support, but the trial shall proceed as if he were present. (Acts 1955, ch. 186, § 6.)'

'36--228. Blood tests to determine paternity.--The court, on motion of the defendant, shall order the mother, her child and the defendant to submit to one or more blood grouping tests by a duly qualified physician to determine whether or not the defendant can be excluded as being the father of the child, and the results of such tests may be received in evidence but only in cases where definite exclusion is established. (Acts 1955, ch. 186, § 7.)'

The defendant availed himself of the provisions of 36--228 but the results of the blood test were inconclusive and did not exclude the defendant as the father of the child.

The defendant did not demand a jury trial as authorized under T.C.A. Section 36--227 and elected to be tried before the County Judge who also presided over the Juvenile Court of Fayette...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • State ex rel. Cihlar v. Crawford
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • February 20, 2001
    ...other than non-access or sterility. See Jackson v. Thornton, 133 Tenn. 36, 39, 179 S.W. 384, 384 (1915); Frazier v. McFerren, 55 Tenn.App. 431, 440, 402 S.W.2d 467, 472 (1964). Thus, the Tennessee Supreme Court has permitted a decedent's family members to challenge an individual's right to ......
  • Minnich v. Rivera
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1986
    ...335, 233 A.2d 65 (1967); Leach v. State, 398 P.2d 848 (Okl.1965); In Re F.J.F., 312 N.W.2d 718 (S.D.1981); and Frazier v. McFerren, 55 Tenn.App. 431, 402 S.W.2d 467 (1964). The standard of proof called for by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6704(d) is in accord with the general The respective interests of t......
  • Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit Judge
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 24, 1974
    ...v. State ex rel. Cooper, 398 P.2d 848 (Okl.1965); Oliveira v. Santosuosso, 102 R.I. 362, 230 A.2d 864 (1967); Frazier v. McFerren, 55 Tenn.App. 431, 402 S.W.2d 467 (1964); State v. Judd, 27 Utah 2d 79, 493 P.2d 604 (1972); Bielawski v. Burke, 121 Vt. 62, 147 A.2d 674 (1959); State ex rel. C......
  • State Ex Rel Cihlar v Crawford, 99-00517
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • August 22, 2000
    ...other than non-access or sterility. See Jackson v. Thornton, 133 Tenn. 36, 39, 179 S.W. 384, 384 (1915); Frazier v. McFerren, 55 Tenn. App. 431, 440, 402 S.W.2d 467, 472 (1964). Thus, the Tennessee Supreme Court has permitted a decedent's family members to challenge an individual's right to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT