Freeman v. State
| Decision Date | 09 November 1962 |
| Citation | 15 McCanless 27,211 Tenn. 27,362 S.W.2d 251 |
| Parties | , 211 Tenn. 27 Phillip FREEMAN v. STATE of Tennessee. |
| Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Maddux & Cameron, T. Eugene Jared, Cookeville, for plaintiff in error.
George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen., Thomas E. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for defendant in error.
The defendant below, Phillip Freeman, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter growing out of an automobile accident and sentenced to serve not more than five years in the State Prison.
Lucille Cleghorn (alias Ripley) was tried jointly with the defendant for the same offense. She received the same sentence as the defendant but she did not appeal.
The principal insistence here is that the case of Eager and Hill v. State, 205 Tenn. 156, 325 S.W.2d 815, does not apply and is distinguishable from the case at Bar.
Mickey Judd, a little girl of five years of age, was killed on September 1, 1960, by an automobile owned by the defendant and being driven by his companion Lucille Cleghorn (alias Ripley) as she (the victim) was sitting in a lawn chair on a patio adjacent to or in the vicinity of the Judd Motel, which was being operated by her mother while her father was working in North Dakota. Her brother, Michael, suffered a broken cheek bone as a result of the same incident. The motel was leased to the victim's father by her paternal grandfather, Oren Judd, who lived in one of the cabins of the motel.
It seems that the defendant and Lucille had been about the cabin occupied by Oren Judd on that date drinking beer with him. They knew that the victim and her brother played in front of the cabins. According to the defendant's statement to the Sheriff he drank 8 cans of beer during this period and Lucille, in her statement, said she drank four cans of beer.
The Sheriff testified that at the time the defendant and Lucille were arrested, shortly after the incident occurred, they were both drunk. This testimony was corroborated by other State's witnesses, who saw them after their arrest.
After the defendant and Lucille were arrested they were asked by the Sheriff if they had any objection to a blood test to determine the alcoholic content of their blood. Lucille, in granting permission, stated that she had been drinking for about a week and said, 'I am sure mine will show up bad.'
Earlier that morning after the defendant and Lucille came to Oren Judd's cabin, Lucille left in the defendant's car and was to return in about thirty minutes. When she did not come back when she was expected to do so, the defendant became somewhat uneasy about her, saying in the presence of the victim's mother that he did not have any insurance on the car and that Lucille was drunker than he was. During the afternoon the defendant and Lucille carried Oren Judd's dog to the veterinarian, and they made this trip in defendant's car, a 1949 Chrysler, with Lucille driving. The returned about 3:00-3:15 and as they were turning off the highway into the motel drive, the brakes on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Etzweiler
...Story v. United States, 16 F.2d 342 (D.C.Cir.1926), cert. denied, 274 U.S. 739, 47 S.Ct. 576, 71 L.Ed. 1318 (1927); Freeman v. State, 211 Tenn. 27, 362 S.W.2d 251 (1962). At common law, Etzweiler could not have been guilty as a principal. He was not actually or constructively present during......
-
State v. Jones
...the road and into a lake, and for assisting the driver in concealing the car after the accident. Id. at 898-99. In Freeman v. State, 211 Tenn. 27, 362 S.W.2d 251 (1962), this Court held that the defendant was criminally negligent in permitting his intoxicated companion to drive his (the def......
-
HABIT, CRIME, AND CULPABILITY.
...theory where car owner was a passenger in the car at the time of the accident)); see also id. at 485 n. 155 (citing Freeman v. State, 362 S.W.2d 251, 253 (Tenn. 1962) (upholding car owner's conviction as principal for manslaughter on negligent entrustment theory where car owner was a passen......