Fricks v. Cole, 41261

Citation111 Ga.App. 635,142 S.E.2d 382
Decision Date29 April 1965
Docket NumberNo. 41261,No. 3,41261,3
PartiesAlfred N. FRICKS et al. v. Marvin C. COLE
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Georgia)

Parker, Clary & Kent, Horace T. Clary, Rome, for plaintiffs in error.

Wright, Walther & Morgan, Clinton J. Morgan, Rome, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

FRANKUM, Judge.

It is the duty of this court to inquire into its jurisdiction, and where it appears that jurisdiction is lacking, the court should dismiss the writ of error, even though the defendant in error has made no motion to dismiss. Personal Credit Corp. v. Goldwire, 88 Ga.App. 125, 76 S.E.2d 129. Service of a copy of the bill of exceptions on the defendant in error or his attorney after it has been certified by the trial court, or due and legal waiver or acknowledgment thereof by the defendant in error or his counsel is essential to give the appellate court jurisdiction to consider the errors assigned. Code Ann. § 6-911; South Side Atlanta Bank v. Anderson, 200 Ga. 322, 37 S.E.2d 404. Accordingly, where, as in this case, there is no acknowledgment of service signed by the defendant in error or his attorney attached to the bill of exceptions, nor is there a certificate of service appended thereto, the writ of error must be dismissed. Ray v. Edwards, 106 Ga.App. 270, 126 S.E.2d 647; Johnston v. First Nat. Bank of Brunswick, 220 Ga. 340, 138 S.E.2d 670; Warnock v. Woodard, 183 Ga. 367, 188 S.E. 336; Izlar v. Central of Ga. R. Co., 162 Ga. 558, 134 S.E. 315.

Writ of error dismissed.

BELL, P. J., and HALL, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Trammel v. CLAYTON COUNTY BD.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 2001
    ...Kirby v. Woods, 212 Ga. 20(1), 90 S.E.2d 4 (1955); Peoples Loan Co. v. Allen, 198 Ga. 516, 518, 32 S.E.2d 175 (1944); Fricks v. Cole, 111 Ga.App. 635, 142 S.E.2d 382 (1965). For defendants to bring a cross-appeal, this Court must have jurisdiction of the underlying appeal. OCGA § 5-6-38; Wo......
  • Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Plumstead, 41251
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 1965

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT