Friedland v. Maloney
| Decision Date | 09 March 1989 |
| Citation | 148 A.D.2d 814,538 N.Y.S.2d 650 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Ellen FRIEDLAND, Appellant, v. Donald MALONEY, as Records Access Officer of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David C. Leven, Prisoners' Legal Services, (Milagros Rosario Arzuaga, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Kathleen Morrison, Albany, of counsel), for respondents.
Before CASEY, J.P., and MIKOLL, YESAWICH, MERCURE and HARVEY, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered September 17, 1987 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition on the ground of mootness.
Through correspondence dated February 23, 1987, petitioner, a paralegal employed by Prisoners' Legal Services (hereinafter PLS), requested various documents under the Freedom of Information Law (hereinafter FOIL) (Public Officers Law art. 6) from the Department of Correctional Services. The request was for any and all documents relating to budgeting, funding, expenditures, requests for funding and medical care at Bayview Correctional Facility, a medium security prison for women in New York City, for the budget years 1986-1987 and 1987-1988.
It appears that immediate steps were taken by the Department to attempt to fulfill the request. Petitioner did not receive an acknowledgement of the request because the Department apparently was of the mistaken belief that PLS did not expect acknowledgements. However, efforts to find and assemble the various documents continued. Subsequently, in a letter dated March 16, 1987, petitioner appealed to the Department's FOIL appeals officer. The appeals officer's staff then began collection and review of documents assembled up to that date and contacted additional personnel to locate other documents. The Department was also processing and issuing 94 other appeal decisions during this time.
Not having received a determination of her appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding on April 14, 1987, returnable May 22, 1987, seeking an order compelling release of the documents requested, costs and counsel fees. On May 21, 1987 the Department issued a determination of petitioner's appeal stating that the appeal was from a "constructive denial" of petitioner's request and that 45 pages of records would be forwarded to her. Adjournments were had in the court proceedings and eventually all documents were released by July 24, 1987. Subsequently, respondents moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the matter was moot. Petitioner in response requested counsel fees. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and denied all relief, finding that petitioner had not established that she was entitled to an award of counse...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Grabell v. NYC Police Dep't
...for documents. See pages 14–15 above. Accordingly, NYPD shall pay petitioner's attorneys' fees.Citing Matter of Friedland v. Maloney , 148 A.D.2d 814, 538 N.Y.S.2d 650 (3d Dept.1989), the NYPD argues that, where an agency has begun to “work[ ] on and respond[ ] to a FOIL request prior to th......
-
Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Transp.
...releasing the documents upon completing its review and not just in response to the litigation (see Matter of Friedland v. Maloney, 148 A.D.2d 814, 816, 538 N.Y.S.2d 650 [1989] ). For the foregoing reasons, the petition is dismissed. Egan Jr., J.P., Clark and Pritzker, JJ., concur. Colangelo......
-
Fichera v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Sterling, Planning Bd. of Town of Sterling, Town of Sterling, Christopher J. Constr., LLC (In re DR), 1512
...of litigation[, and have] failed to produce any evidence that respondents did not act in good faith" ( Matter of Friedland v. Maloney, 148 A.D.2d 814, 816, 538 N.Y.S.2d 650 [3d Dept. 1989] ; see Matter of Cook v. Nassau County Police Dept., 140 A.D.3d 1059, 1060–1061, 34 N.Y.S.3d 150 [2d De......
-
Application for a Judgment Under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law v.
...cannot be said to have “substantially prevailed” so as to be entitled to an award of attorney's fees (Matter of Friedland v. Maloney, 148 A.D.2d 814, 538 N.Y.S.2d 650 [3d Dept.1989] ).Sealing of Court Records For the same reasons that the Maps are exempt from disclosure as set forth above a......