Fries v. Greg G. Wright & Sons, LLC
Citation | 2018 Ohio 3785,120 N.E.3d 426 |
Decision Date | 21 September 2018 |
Docket Number | NO. C-160818,C-160818 |
Parties | Carl FRIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREG G. WRIGHT & SONS, LLC, CKF Ohio Asset Acquisitions, LLC, Margaret Grossmann, Thomas E. Grossmann, and Charles Fischer, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Ohio) |
Cors & Bassett, Kevin R. Feazell, Susan Bell, Cincinnati, and Kelly Johnson, for Plaintiff-Appellee,
Thomas E. Grossmann, Cincinnati, for Defendants-Appellants Greg G. Wright & Sons, LLC, Margaret Grossmann, and Thomas E. Grossmann,
Charles Fischer, for Defendants-Appellants CKF Ohio Asset Acquisitions, LLC, and Charles Fischer.
{¶ 1} This court is tasked with determining when causes of action involving members of a limited liability company and litigation arising from the breach of several lease agreements fall within the arbitration clause of Greg G. Wright & Sons's operating agreement. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court's judgment in part, reverse it in part, and remand the cause for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} Defendant-appellant Greg G. Wright & Sons, LLC, is a machine tool, stamping, engraving, and CNC lathe company that was founded in 1860 by the grandfather of defendant-appellant Margaret W. Grossmann. In 2003, Margaret Grossmann purchased the assets of Greg G. Wright & Sons from her father, who had been the sole owner, and hired plaintiff-appellee Carl A. Fries, III, as the chief executive officer. When he was hired, Fries was given a 15 percent ownership interest in Greg G. Wright & Sons. After each year of employment, Fries earned an additional three percent interest. By the time he left the position in March of 2011, Fries had accumulated a 36 percent ownership interest in Greg G. Wright & Sons.
{¶ 3} Section 9.1 of the operating agreement of Greg G. Wright & Sons contained the following dispute resolution provisions:
{¶ 4} In 2013, two years after Fries had left Greg G. Wright & Sons, a complaint was filed against Greg G. Wright & Sons and Fries individually alleging that Greg G. Wright & Sons had failed to make payments on certain equipment leases—payments for which Fries had made a personal guarantee. The plaintiff, PNC Equipment Finance, LLC, sought a total of $336,101.79 in damages, jointly and severally, from Greg G. Wright & Sons and Fries. Defendant-appellant Thomas Grossmann, an attorney, sought an extension of time to file an answer and subsequently filed an answer on behalf of only Greg G. Wright & Sons. Fries, who had been previously represented by Grossmann in other matters relating to Greg G. Wright & Sons, claimed that he was not informed that Grossmann was filing only on behalf of Greg G. Wright & Sons, and subsequently failed to file his own answer in the case.
{¶ 5} During the course of the litigation, PNC Equipment Finance filed a motion for a substitution of parties, asserting that the right to collect the money due had been transferred to defendant-appellant CFK Ohio Asset Acquisitions, LLC. While the motion was filed on behalf of PNC Equipment Finance, the signature lines reflect the initials "TEG per telephone authority." The certificate of service was signed by Thomas Grossmann.
{¶ 6} Fries sought to exercise his rights, as a member of Greg G. Wright & Sons, to examine its books and records. Greg G. Wright & Sons, through Thomas Grossmann, refused to allow him to examine the records, claiming that he was no longer a member of Greg G. Wright & Sons. CFK Ohio Asset Acquisitions sought and received a judgment against Fries, and dismissed Greg G. Wright & Sons as a party to the case. Fries filed a motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B), asserting that he had believed that Thomas Grossmann had been representing him as well as Greg G. Wright & Sons. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that Fries had not established that his belief was reasonable. Fries did not appeal that decision.
{¶ 7} On May 19, 2015, Fries filed a verified complaint against Greg G. Wright & Sons, Thomas Grossmann, Margaret Grossmann, CKF Ohio Asset Acquisitions, and Charles Fischer (hereinafter collectively "appellants"). Fries's verified complaint lists six causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, conversion, right of reimbursement, fraudulent concealment, and civil conspiracy. The first three causes of action arose from his status as a member with Greg G. Wright & Sons, the second set of claims involved his having signed as a personal guarantor on the lease agreements that resulted in litigation.
{¶ 9} After conducting a hearing on the motion to stay the proceedings, the trial court found that appellants had waived their right to seek arbitration, and that the record had not been sufficiently developed to determine if the claims involved fall within the scope of the arbitration clause. Appellants appeal the decisions of the trial court to deny their motion for a more definite statement and their motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration, and to grant Fries's motion to compel discovery.
{¶ 10} In their first assignment of error, appellants claim that the trial court erred when it denied their motion for a more definite statement for Fries's failure to attach documents to his verified complaint. They claim that the decision was a final, appealable order because it affected "a substantial right in an action and prevent[ed] a judgment." See R.C. 2505.02(B)(1).
{...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng
...; Fields v. Herrnstein Chrysler, Inc. , 2013 WL 772822, at *6–7 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2013) ; see also Fries v. Greg G. Wright 220 & Sons, LLC , 120 N.E.3d 426, 444 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018) ; I Sports , 813 N.E.2d at 8–9.On the other hand, these decisions contain little reasoning, see, e.g. , ......
-
AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng
...v. Herrnstein Chrysler, Inc., 2013 WL 772822, at *6-7 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2013); see also Fries v. Greg G. Wright 220 &Sons, LLC, 120 N.E.3d 426, 444 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018); I Sports, 813 N.E.2d at 8-9. On the other hand, these decisions contain little reasoning, see, e.g., Discovery Res.,......
-
Dayton Childrens Hosp. v. Garrett Day LLC
...Celebrezze v. Netzley , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 53864, 1988 WL 87566, *3 (Aug. 4, 1988).3 See also Fries v. Greg G. Wright & Sons, LLC , 1st Dist. Hamilton, 2018-Ohio-3785, 120 N.E.3d 426, ¶ 11 ; Santomieri v. Mangen , 3d Dist. Auglaize, 2018-Ohio-1443, 111 N.E.3d 483, ¶ 7 ; State v. Horsley......
-
Avery v. Acad. Invs., L.L.C.
...allegations in the case. See Arnold v. Burger King, 2015-Ohio-4485, 48 N.E.3d 69, ¶ 62 (8th Dist.); see also Fries v. Greg G. Wright & Sons, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-3785, 120 N.E.3d 426, ¶ 40 (1st Dist.) ("When making this determination, we are not limited to the form in which the causes of actio......