Ft. Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Co. v. Fox

Decision Date09 November 1889
Citation42 Kan. 490,22 P. 583
CourtKansas Supreme Court
PartiesTHE FORT SCOTT, WICHITA & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HUGH FOX

Decided July, 1889

Error from Harvey District Court.

ON September 1, 1886, Hugh Fox instituted an action against the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, and on September 1, 1887, by permission of the court, Fox filed a supplemental and amended petition making The Fort Scott Wichita & Western Railway Company an additional party defendant, of which the following is a copy:

"Comes now the plaintiff, and for his amended petition herein says that the defendant, the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, is, and at all times herein mentioned was a railway corporation duly and regularly incorporated under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas, for the purpose of operating a locomotive steam railroad within said state; that the defendant, the Fort Scott, Wichita &amp Western Railway Company, is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a railway corporation duly and regularly incorporated under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas, for the purpose of operating a standard-gauge, steam locomotive railway within said state; that the plaintiff is now, and forthe past five years has been continuously, the owner of and in possession of the following-described real-estate property, to wit: Lots 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24, in block 1, in Blake's addition to the city of Newton, Harvey county, as shown by the recorded plat thereof that immediately to the west of the plaintiff's said property, and along the west end of said property, and adjoining thereto, there was for many years prior to about the 27th day of July, 1886, a street, avenue and public thoroughfare of the said city of Newton, known and designated as Kansas avenue, running north and south; that said Kansas avenue had for many years prior to said 27th day of July 1886, been dedicated and set apart to the use of the public, and to the especial use of the adjoining lot-owners, as a public street and highway, and had been established as a public highway prior to said date, and had been used as a public highway continuously and constantly for more than fifteen years prior to said 27th day of July, 1886; that the said avenue was the only way by which the said plaintiff could have ingress and egress to and from his said premises from the west end thereof; that on or about the said 27th day of July, 1886, the said defendant, the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, obstructed the said avenue in front of the plaintiff's said premises, by digging ditches and trenches, and laying down and building its main line and side-tracks therein, which consist of iron rails and cross-ties placed and constructed along said avenue, forming what is known as a standard-gauge locomotive steam railroad track; that said defendant, the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, at the time of obstructing said street as aforesaid lowered the established grade of said avenue by its trenches and ditches from three to five feet, and on said July 27, 1886, so constructed its tracks in front of the plaintiff's premises on said avenue, and so obstructed said avenue in the manner aforesaid, as to wholly impair and destroy said avenue and render it wholly useless as a public highway; and by such obstruction the plaintiff has been deprived of all means of ingress and egress to and from his said premises from the west end thereof; that the obstruction of said street and avenue as aforesaid was necessary for the proper and skillful construction of said railroad, and said railroad was at the time and in the manner aforesaid skillfully and properly constructed; that the defendant, the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, at the time aforesaid appropriated said street and avenue in front of the plaintiff's premises for the use of its said railroad by virtue of its right of eminent domain, but without any condemnation proceedings therefor; that after appropriating said avenue as aforesaid, said defendant, the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, continued to occupy the same with its tracks, and continued to operate its road upon and along said avenue in front of the plaintiff's premises by running its cars, engines and trains thereon, until about the 15th day of November, 1886; that on or about the 15th day of November, 1886, a receiver was appointed over the railroad so owned and operated by the said St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company by the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas, in an action then pending in the said circuit court for the foreclosure of first-mortgage bonds of said railroad, wherein the Union Trust Company of the state of New York was plaintiff, and the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company was defendant; that under and by virtue of an order of sale of said circuit court in said action, said railroad with all its property was sold on the 23d day of May, 1887; that on or about the 1st day of July, 1887, the defendant, the Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Company, purchased and acquired the said railroad formerly known as the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, and on or about the 1st day of July, 1887, took possession of said railroad, and of the tracks in the said avenue in front of the plaintiff's premises above described, and has ever since so taking possession of said railroad continued to operate and still continues to operate the same upon and along said Kansas avenue in front of the plaintiff's said premises; that said railroad tracks have, since they were first constructed upon and along said Kansas avenue, remained in the same condition and position in which they were first constructed, and are now in the same condition; that the defendant, the Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Company, has permanently appropriated said Kansas avenue along and in front of plaintiff's said premises, to its own use, for the purpose of operating said railroad; that by the permanent appropriation of the said Kansas avenue as aforesaid, the plaintiff has been permanently deprived of all means of ingress and egress to and from his said premises from the west end thereof; and by said appropriation said Kansas avenue has been entirely destroyed as a public highway; that the defendant, the Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Company, has never condemned the plaintiff's right in said avenue,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Vanderburgh v. City of Minneapolis
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1906
    ...6 Wash. 1; Port Huron v. Voorheis, 50 Mich. 506; Morris v. Mayor, 10 N.J.Eq. 352; Abendroth v. Manhattan, 122 N.Y. 1, and see Fort Scott v. Fox, 42 Kan. 490; Park v. C. & S.W.R. Co., 43 Iowa 636, 639; v. Iowa, 113 Iowa 716, the constitutions of Kansas and Iowa providing for compensation for......
  • Foster Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1909
    ... ... right of a railway company which constructs a steam railway ... upon a street ... 71, 47 N.W. 455, 10 L. R. A ... 268; Ft. Scott, W. & W. Ry. Co. v. Fox, 42 Kan. 490, ... 22 P. 583; ... Western Ry. Co., supra, the ... abutting owner recovered damages ... ...
  • DeGeofroy v. Merchants Bridge Terminal Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1904
    ... ... the western line thereof approaches the eastern or building ... line of plaintiffs' ... ...
  • Foster Lumber Co. v. Ark. Valley & W. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1909
    ...v. Chicago, B. & N. R. Co., 39 Minn. 286, 39 N.W. 629; Lamm v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 54 Minn. 71; The Ft. Scott, W. & W. Ry. Co. v. Fox, 42 Kan. 490, 22 P. 583; Central Branch U. P. Ry. Co. v Twine, 23 Kan. 415; The South Carolina Ry. Co. v. Steiner et al., 44 Ga. 546; Egerer v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT