Fulkerson v. The Board of Commissioners of Harper County

Decision Date01 July 1883
Citation1 P. 261,31 Kan. 125
PartiesG. Y. FULKERSON v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HARPER COUNTY
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Error from Harper District Court.

THE opinion states the facts. April 3, 1883, judgment for The Board of Commissioners and against Fulkerson, who brings it here for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Finch & Finch, and I. P. Campbell, for plaintiff in error.

J. Paul Grove, for defendant in error.

VALENTINE J. All the Justices concurring.

OPINION

VALENTINE, J.:

On July 15, 1882, G. Y. Fulkerson and fifty-five others petitioned the board of county commissioners of Harper county, Kansas "to set off and organize a new township" in that county. July 17, 1882, the board refused to grant the prayer of this petition. Afterward, G. Y. Fulkerson took an appeal to the district court, provided he could take an appeal in such a case. He founded his right to take the appeal upon § 30 of the act relating to counties and county officers, and upon the claim that he was "a signer of said petition, and a resident, householder, tax-payer, and voter, within the boundaries of said proposed new township." April 3, 1883, the county attorney of Harper county moved to dismiss the appeal, on the grounds that Fulkerson could not properly take an appeal, and that no appeal lies from the board of county commissioners to the district court in such a case. The district court sustained this motion, dismissed the appeal, and rendered judgment for costs in favor of the board of county commissioners and against Fulkerson; and Fulkerson now brings the case to this court, and asks for a reversal of said judgment.

Section 16, chapter 25, of the act relating to counties and county officers, provides, among other things, as follows:

"SEC. 16. The board of county commissioners of each county shall have power, at any meeting, . . . Sixth, to set off, organize, and change the boundaries of townships in their respective counties; to designate and give names therefor, and to fix the time and place of holding the first election therein."

Section 24, of said chapter, reads as follows:

"SEC. 24. The board of county commissioners shall not set off or organize any new township, unless it shall contain territory equal to at least thirty square miles, and at least two hundred inhabitants within the limits thereof, except when an incorporated city or town is included in the limits of said township; nor shall any township be set off and organized, unless a petition be first presented to the board, signed by at least fifty electors resident therein."

Sections 28 and 29, of said chapter, provide for the allowing of accounts against the county and the issuing of orders therefor.

Section 30, of said chapter, reads as follows:

"SEC. 30. Any person who shall be aggrieved by any decision of the board of commissioners, may appeal from the decision of such board to the district court of the same county, by causing a written notice of such appeal to be served on the clerk of such board, within thirty days after the making of such decision, and executing a bond to such county with sufficient security, to be approved by the clerk of said board, conditioned for the faithful prosecution of such appeal and the payment of all costs that shall be adjudged against the appellant."

Under the constitution and statutes of the state of Kansas the board of county commissioners has various powers--legislative, administrative, executive discretionary, and quasi judicial. Many of their powers are of a purely political character, but some of them, as before stated, are of a quasi judicial character. Some of the statutes conferring power upon the county commissioners are mandatory, while other statutes conferring power upon them are purely directory, and the powers conferred are often entirely discretionary. The constitution provides, among other things, that "the legislature may confer upon tribunals transacting the county business of the several counties such powers of local legislation and administration as it shall deem expedient." (Const., art. 2, § 21.) The legislature has conferred upon the board of county...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • State v. Troy Twp., 28008
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • August 16, 2017
    ...or discretionary power or purely ministerial power, no appeal will lie." Id. at 163–65, 37 N.W. at 739–40 (quoting Fulkerson v. Stevens , 31 Kan. 125, 1 P. 261, 263 (1883) ). The court concluded that the issue was quasi-judicial and that the appeal was therefore constitutionally permissible......
  • Codington Cnty. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Codington Cnty.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1927
    ...nature that an appeal will lie. The reasons for such holding are well stated in the following quotation from Fulkerson v. Board of Com'rs, 31 Kan. 125, 1 P. 261, which was quoted with approval by Chief Justice Tripp in Pierre Water-Works Co. v. Hughes Co., 5 Dak. 145, 37 N. W. 733: “Now wil......
  • Codington County v. Codington County Commissioners
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1927
    ...nature that an appeal will lie. The reasons for such holding are well stated in the following quotation from Fulkerson v. Board of Com’rs, 31 Kan. 125, 1 P. 261, which was quoted with approval by Chief Justice Tripp in Pierre Water-Works Co. v. Hughes Co., 5 Dak. 145, 37 NW “Now will an app......
  • Heine Farms v. Yankton County
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • July 24, 2002
    ...commission decision was explored in greater detail in the Codington County case cited above. Quoting with approval from Fulkerson v. Stevens, 31 Kan. 125, 1 P. 261 (1883), this Court [W]hat are the limitations upon the privilege of persons to take appeals from the decisions of the board of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT