Fuller v. State, WD 72705.
| Decision Date | 27 September 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. WD 72705.,WD 72705. |
| Citation | 361 S.W.3d 22 |
| Parties | George FULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 2011.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Joel F. May, Judge.Ronald E. Partee, for Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, for Respondent.
Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.
ORDER
George Fuller appeals from the motion court's denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Fuller claims that he was entitled to reopen the Rule 29.15 proceedings because he was abandoned by counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Fuller v. Partee
...nor did he discuss this decision with George. This Court ultimately affirmed the judgment of the motion court. Fuller v. State , 361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo. App. W.D. 2011).Following this court's decision on George's appeal, the Fullers brought suit against Partee. Ultimately, the Fullers jointly fi......
- Brooke Drywall of Columbia, Inc. v. Bldg. Constr. Enters., Inc.
-
Fuller v. State
...leave by this court to file an appeal out of time. We thereafter affirmed the motion court in a per curium order. Fuller v. State, 361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo.App. W.D.2011).On April 21, 2014, Fuller filed a second motion to re-open his Rule 29.15 proceedings which again alleged abandonment and fraud......