Fullerton v. Carpenter
Decision Date | 09 December 1902 |
Citation | 71 S.W. 98,97 Mo. App. 197 |
Parties | FULLERTON v. CARPENTER. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; William Zachritz, Judge.
Action by Humphrey Fullerton, trustee, against James W. Carpenter. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Henry M. Post, for appellant. Skinker & Flitcraft, for respondent.
The motion for new trial is as follows:
The first, second, third, fourth, and fifth grounds of the motion amount to this: that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and for that reason should have been for the plaintiff. The jury, or the court sitting as a jury, is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence, and their findings will not be reviewed on appeal, unless there is no substantial evidence to support the verdict, or it is obvious that the verdict is the result of passion, prejudice, or corruption. Culbertson v. Hill, 87 Mo. 553; Hull v. Railway Co. (K. C.) 60 Mo. App. 593.
In respect to the sixth ground,—"that the court erred in excluding proper evidence,"— we find but one objection made by plaintiff to the evidence offered by defendant. The bill of exceptions shows that the evidence was simply "objected to." No grounds for the objection were assigned, nor was any exception saved to the ruling of the court on the objection. Unless the grounds of an objection to the admission of evidence are specified when it is made, the objection will not be considered on appeal. Lumber Co. v. Rogers, 145 Mo. 445, 46 S. W. 1079; Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co., 140 Mo. 458, 41 S. W. 943.
In respect to the seventh ground, — "that the court admitted improper evidence," — the bill of exceptions fails to show that any evidence was admitted by the court to which plaintiff saved an exception.
Only one instruction was given. This was objected to when given, but the court's attention was not called...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shinn v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis
... ... [ State v ... Scott, 214 Mo. 257, 113 S.W. 1069; State v ... Grant, 194 Mo. 364, 92 S.W. 698; Fullerton v ... Carpenter, 97 Mo.App. 197, 71 S.W. 98; Jennings v ... Kansas City, 105 Mo.App. 677, 78 S.W. 1041.] It is very ... true that defendant's ... ...
-
Shinn v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis.
...if error there be. State v. Scott, 214 Mo. 257, 113 S. W. 1069; State v. Grant, 194 Mo. 364, 367, 92 S. W. 698; Fullerton v. Carpenter, 97 Mo. App. 197, 201, 71 S. W. 98; Jennings v. Kansas City, 105 Mo. App. 677, 679, 78 S. W. 1041. It is very true that defendant's motion for a new trial i......
-
Corum v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
...the plaintiff or the witnesses of the defendant are entitled to the greater credit. Rattan v. Electric Co., 129 Mo.App. 270; Fullerton v. Carpenter, 97 Mo.App. 197; State Woodward, 171 Mo. 593; Veale v. Green, 105 Mo.App. 182; Hurley v. Railroad, 120 Mo.App. 262. (3) Appellants' second and ......
- Fullerton v. Carpenter