Ga. Paper Stock Co v. State Tax Bd. Of Ga.

Decision Date13 May 1932
Docket NumberNo. 8551.,8551.
Citation164 S.E. 197,174 Ga. 816
PartiesGEORGIA PAPER STOCK CO. v. STATE TAX BOARD OF GEORGIA et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
Syllabus by the Court.

1. The act of 1929 (Ga. Laws 1929, p. 103) provides for the raising of public revenue by a tax upon the privilege of engaging in certain occupations and by a tax upon certain business and commercial transactions and enterprises; and for the ascertainment and assessment and collection of such taxes, etc. By section 3 of that act is imposed on "every person engaging or continuing within this State in the business of manufacturing, compounding, or preparing for sale, profit, or use any article, substance or substances, commodity or commodities, the amount of such tax to be equal to the value of the articles manufactured, compounded, or prepared for sale, * * * a tax of one half of one mill on the dollar thereof." Section 7 provides: "Upon every person engaged or continuing within this State in any and every business not included in the preceding sections there is levied and shall be collected a tax equal to two mills on the dollar of the gross receipts of any such business." The plaintiff was engaged in purchasing raw material known as "waste paper, assorting, classifying, cleaning and baling, and putting the same in condition for sale as 'paper stock' and known to the trade as such." The state tax commissioner and the state tax board classified the business as falling under section 7 of the sales tax act, supra. The superior court upheld this classification. Held, that this was error. The classification should have been under section 3.

2. The court erred in upholding the classification of the state tax commissioner and the state tax board.

ATKINSON, J., dissenting.

Error from Superior Court, Pulton County; John D. Humphries, Judge.

Petition for injunction by the Georgia Paper Stock Company against the State Tax Board of Georgia and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

The plaintiff brought a petition for injunction against the members of the state tax board and the tax commissioner of Georgia. The judge heard the case on an agreed statement of facts, as follows: "Petitioner is a corporation organized under the laws of Georgia, with its place of business in Atlanta, Ga. Within the time provided by law, petitioner filed its gross-receipts (general sales) tax-return for the period beginning October 1, and ending December 31, 1929, and paid the taxes under the classification of 'manufacturing or preparing for sale' to wit, $21.34. * * * Subsequently the State tax-commissioner proposed a reassessment against petitioner, said reassessment being for the amount of $61.65, leaving an additional tax claimed to be due by said petitioner of $40.31. The petitioner held a conference with the State tax-commissioner, and the said tax-commissioner overruled the contention of the petitioner that said petitioner was entitled to pay the tax under the classification of 'manufacturing or preparing for sale.' Petitioner then, within thirty days after said notice, filed an appeal to the State Tax Board, on which appeal a hearing was held before said board, and said board decided adversely to the petitioner. The petitioner's business consists of purchasing raw material known to the trade as 'waste paper, ' assorting, classifying, cleaning and baling, and putting the same in condition for sale as 'paper stock, ' and being known to the trade as such. The processes used by the petitioner include the use both of hand labor and machinery in an organized and ordered routine through regular processes. The machinery used consists primarily of the conveyers used for shaking and cleaning, and presses used for baling. The assorting is done by chemical processes and hand labor. The average cost of the waste paper purchased by the petitioner is approximately $6 • per ton, and the average cost of the processes used by the petitioner in conditioning the stock for sale as paper stock amounts to approximately $6 per ton. After the paper has been thus assorted, cleaned, and baled, it is sold to the paper manufacturers as paper stock to be used in manufacturing paper for the retail and jobbing trade; and in so far as the paper manufacturer is concerned, this stock is its (the paper manufacturer's) raw material. The company employs a traveling salesman, buys its goods in small quantities, and sells in large quantities to paper mills."

Injunction was denied, and the plaintiff excepted.

Jones, Puller, Russell & Clapp, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

John A. Smith, of Talbatton, C. N. Davie, J. F. Kemp, L. S. Camp, P. H. Doyal, and

R. O. Norman, all of Atlanta, Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., and T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants in error.

HILL, J. (after stating the foregoing facts).

The Legislature of this state in 1929 (Ga. Laws 1929, p. 103) passed an act providing for the raising of public revenue by a tax upon the privilege of engaging in certain occupations, and by a tax upon certain business and commercial transactions and enterprises, etc. By section 3 of the act is imposed "upon every person engaging or continuing within...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Fulton Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 1 Marzo 1947
    ... ... 666, 176 ... S.E. 702; Reynolds v. Wingate, 164 Ga. 317, 138 S.E ... 666; Smith v. State, 15 Ga.App. 536, 538, 83 S.E ... 886; John Church Co. v. AEtna Indemnity Co., 13 ... Ga.App ... to mark off and separate alternative ideas. Georgia Paper" ... Stock Co. v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, ... 164 S.E. 197 ...         \xC2" ... ...
  • Union Cent. Life Ins. Co v. Bank
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 1 Marzo 1947
    ...of aircraft" was used in its natural meaning as a connective to mark off and separate alternative ideas. Georgia Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, 164 S.E. 197. When we consider the context of the phrase "or from travel or flight in any species of aircraft" in the ......
  • City of Buford v. Gwinnett County, A03A0313.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 24 Junio 2003
    ...is to mark an alternative and present choice, implying an election to do one of two things. Georgia Paper Stock Company v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, 819, 164 S.E. 197 (1932). It does not imply an election to choose more than one. In Gearinger v. Lee, 266 Ga. 167, 169(2), 465 ......
  • Giles v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 Enero 2022
    ...‘to mark an alternative and present choice, implying an election to do one of two things.’ "), quoting Ga. Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Bd. , 174 Ga. 816, 819, 164 S.E. 197 (1932).7 See State v. Mills , 268 Ga. 873, 874-875, 495 S.E.2d 1 (1998) (explaining that the docketing of a notice of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT