Ga. Paper Stock Co v. State Tax Bd. Of Ga.
Decision Date | 13 May 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 8551.,8551. |
Citation | 164 S.E. 197,174 Ga. 816 |
Parties | GEORGIA PAPER STOCK CO. v. STATE TAX BOARD OF GEORGIA et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
1. The act of 1929 (Ga. Laws 1929, p. 103) provides for the raising of public revenue by a tax upon the privilege of engaging in certain occupations and by a tax upon certain business and commercial transactions and enterprises; and for the ascertainment and assessment and collection of such taxes, etc. By section 3 of that act is imposed on "every person engaging or continuing within this State in the business of manufacturing, compounding, or preparing for sale, profit, or use any article, substance or substances, commodity or commodities, the amount of such tax to be equal to the value of the articles manufactured, compounded, or prepared for sale, * * * a tax of one half of one mill on the dollar thereof." Section 7 provides: "Upon every person engaged or continuing within this State in any and every business not included in the preceding sections there is levied and shall be collected a tax equal to two mills on the dollar of the gross receipts of any such business." The plaintiff was engaged in purchasing raw material known as "waste paper, assorting, classifying, cleaning and baling, and putting the same in condition for sale as 'paper stock' and known to the trade as such." The state tax commissioner and the state tax board classified the business as falling under section 7 of the sales tax act, supra. The superior court upheld this classification. Held, that this was error. The classification should have been under section 3.
2. The court erred in upholding the classification of the state tax commissioner and the state tax board.
Error from Superior Court, Pulton County; John D. Humphries, Judge.
Petition for injunction by the Georgia Paper Stock Company against the State Tax Board of Georgia and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Reversed.
The plaintiff brought a petition for injunction against the members of the state tax board and the tax commissioner of Georgia. The judge heard the case on an agreed statement of facts, as follows:
Injunction was denied, and the plaintiff excepted.
Jones, Puller, Russell & Clapp, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
R. O. Norman, all of Atlanta, Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., and T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants in error.
HILL, J. (after stating the foregoing facts).
The Legislature of this state in 1929 (Ga. Laws 1929, p. 103) passed an act providing for the raising of public revenue by a tax upon the privilege of engaging in certain occupations, and by a tax upon certain business and commercial transactions and enterprises, etc. By section 3 of the act is imposed ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Fulton Nat. Bank
... ... 666, 176 ... S.E. 702; Reynolds v. Wingate, 164 Ga. 317, 138 S.E ... 666; Smith v. State, 15 Ga.App. 536, 538, 83 S.E ... 886; John Church Co. v. AEtna Indemnity Co., 13 ... Ga.App ... to mark off and separate alternative ideas. Georgia Paper" ... Stock Co. v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, ... 164 S.E. 197 ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Union Cent. Life Ins. Co v. Bank
...of aircraft" was used in its natural meaning as a connective to mark off and separate alternative ideas. Georgia Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, 164 S.E. 197. When we consider the context of the phrase "or from travel or flight in any species of aircraft" in the ......
-
City of Buford v. Gwinnett County, A03A0313.
...is to mark an alternative and present choice, implying an election to do one of two things. Georgia Paper Stock Company v. State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816, 819, 164 S.E. 197 (1932). It does not imply an election to choose more than one. In Gearinger v. Lee, 266 Ga. 167, 169(2), 465 ......
-
Giles v. State
...‘to mark an alternative and present choice, implying an election to do one of two things.’ "), quoting Ga. Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Bd. , 174 Ga. 816, 819, 164 S.E. 197 (1932).7 See State v. Mills , 268 Ga. 873, 874-875, 495 S.E.2d 1 (1998) (explaining that the docketing of a notice of ......