Galdamez v. Biordi Construction Corp.

Decision Date08 April 2008
Docket Number3309N.
Citation2008 NY Slip Op 03104,50 A.D.3d 357,855 N.Y.S.2d 104
PartiesOSCAR GALDAMEZ et al., Respondents, v. BIORDI CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in holding that plaintiffs met their burden of demonstrating the prerequisites for class action certification under CPLR 901 and 902 (see Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 252 AD2d 179, 191 [1998]). Contrary to defendants' contention, plaintiffs sufficiently established that the class was so numerous that joinder of all members was impracticable (see Pesantez v Boyle Envtl. Servs., 251 AD2d 11 [1998]; see also Robidoux v Celani, 987 F2d 931, 935-936 [1993]), and the court properly considered affidavits from several members of the proposed class submitted on reply since the affidavits were in response to matters raised in defendants' opposition (see Ticor Tit. Guar. Co. v Bajraktari, 261 AD2d 156, 157 [1999]). Furthermore, to the extent the motion for class certification was untimely, the court providently exercised its discretion in deeming it timely since the delay in moving was largely the result of defendants' conduct during discovery (see Caesar v Chemical Bank, 118 Misc 2d 118, 121 [1983], affd 106 AD2d 353 [1984], mod on other grounds 66 NY2d 698 [1985]).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Ramos v. Simplexgrinnell LP
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 21, 2011
    ...courts have repeatedly approved class certification of prevailing wage claims against an employer. See Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 855 N.Y.S.2d 104 (1st Dep't 2008); Brandy v. Canea Mare Contracting, Inc., 34 A.D.3d 512, 825 N.Y.S.2d 230 (2d Dep't 2006); Pesantez v. Boy......
  • Rodriguez v. Metro. Cable Commc'n
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 14, 2010
    ...826 N.Y.S.2d 392; Dunn v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 74 A.D.2d 816, 816-817, 425 N.Y.S.2d 359; Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 358, 855 N.Y.S.2d 104; see generally Stern v. Carter, 82 A.D.2d 321, 441 N.Y.S.2d 717). "The purpose of preclass certification discovery is t......
  • Ibarra v. 101 Park Rest. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 1, 2016
    ...with CPLR 902 (see CPLR 2004 ; Argento v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 930, 932–933, 888 N.Y.S.2d 117 ; Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 358, 855 N.Y.S.2d 104 ; ADCO Elec. Corp. v. McMahon, 38 A.D.3d 805, 806–807, 835 N.Y.S.2d 588 ; West End Interiors v. Aim Constr. & Co......
  • Deluca v. Tonawanda Coke Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 31, 2015
    ...Inc., 109 A.D.3d 634, 634, 970 N.Y.S.2d 884 ; Rodriguez, 79 A.D.3d at 842, 913 N.Y.S.2d 292 ; see generally Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 358, 855 N.Y.S.2d 104 ). Furthermore, plaintiff established that she "had a good-faith belief that a motion for class action certifica......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • New York State class actions: make it work - fulfill the promise.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 74 No. 2, January - January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...v. Mansions Catering, Inc., 74 A.D.3d 490, 491, 905 N.Y.S.2d 148, 149 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 2010). (45) Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 357, 855 N.Y.S.2d 104, 105 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 2008). (46) Nawrocki v. Proto Constr. & Dev. Corp., No. 104229/2007, 2010 WL 1540027 (S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT