GALLAGHER HEALTHCARE INS. v. Vogelsang
Decision Date | 04 February 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 01-07-00478-CV.,01-07-00478-CV. |
Citation | 312 S.W.3d 640 |
Parties | GALLAGHER HEALTHCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, Appellant, v. Page M. VOGELSANG, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
David L. Countiss, Walter J. Cicack, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Richard N. Countiss, Countiss Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Appellant.
Alejandro Gonzalez, Melanie Gray, Scarlett Elizabeth Collings, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, Charles Alfred Sturm, Howard L. Steele, Jr., Steele Sturm, LLP, Kimberly Goodling, Doyle Raizner LLP, Murry B. Cohen, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Appellee.
Panel consists of Justices JENNINGS, KEYES, and HIGLEY.
In this breach of contract suit, appellant, Gallagher Healthcare Insurance Services ("GHIS"), challenges the trial court's summary judgment order that denied its motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, Page M. Vogelsang. In one issue on appeal, GHIS contends that the trial court erred in holding that the covenant-not-to-compete provision in Vogelsang's employment agreement was unenforceable.
We reverse and remand.
Vogelsang started working for the Galtney Group, Inc. in 1994 as an insurance broker. In 2001, GHIS purchased Galtney and acquired the services of Vogelsang as a "Producer." GHIS, a second tier subsidiary of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., provides insurance and reinsurance services. As a Producer for GHIS, Vogelsang "had a large responsibility to renew existing business and secure new business."
As part of the purchase of Galtney, GHIS required Vogelsang to enter into an employment agreement with GHIS. In relevant part, the agreement provided:
(Emphasis added). Vogelsang resigned from GHIS on February 15, 2006 and began working for Lockton Companies, Inc., a direct competitor of GHIS. On the same day that Vogelsang resigned, her entire service team also moved to Lockton.
Both sides moved for summary judgment.
In its motion for summary judgment, GHIS contended that Vogelsang's covenant-not-to-compete was enforceable because GHIS "promised to and provided Vogelsang with confidential information, which Vogelsang agreed not to disclose" and that Vogelsang's agreement not to disclose the confidential information was ancillary to GHIS's promise to provide the confidential information. GHIS also argued that the covenant-not-to-compete was reasonable because it only prohibited Vogelsang "from soliciting clients with whom she had actually worked while at GHIS" for a period of two years after termination.
On February 9, 2007 after a two-day hearing, the trial court held, among other things, that the "non-competition promise" in the Employment Agreement was unenforceable, and therefore, "GHIS shall TAKE NOTHING by the claim that Vogelsang has breached the non-competition promise in the Employment." After the trial court's interlocutory order, the trial court granted the parties' joint motion to non-suit all claims and parties except "GHIS's claim against Page M. Vogelsang that she breached the covenant-not-to-compete provision of the GHIS employment agreement." GHIS retained its "rights to (i) to appeal the Court's judgment that the covenant-not-to-compete...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Llc v. Stelly
- D'Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, Inc.
- Merritt Hawkins & Assocs., LLC v. Gresham
- Alliantgroup, L.P. v. Feingold
-
Employee Exits: Texas Non-Compete Agreements In Post-Employment Disputes
...if it is broader than necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the employer. Gallagher Healthcare Ins. Servs. v. Vogelsang, 312 S.W.3d 640, 654 (Tex. App.'Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (citing DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 682 (Tex.1990)). Accordingly, even i......
-
Texas. Practice Text
...limits to a particular client base are generally considered a reasonable alternative. See Gallagher Healthcare Ins. Servs. v. Vogelsang, 312 S.W.3d 640, 654 (Tex. App. 2009). 88. See Evan’s World Travel , 978 S.W.3d at 232; John R. Ray & Sons v. Stroman, 923 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Tex. App. 1996); ......
-
From Trade Secrecy to Seclusion
...“employees’ salaries” and employees were accused of “en masse” hiring from defendant); Gallagher Healthcare Ins. Servs. v. Vogelsang, 312 S.W.3d 640, 644–45, 651–52 (Tex. App. 2009) (finding employee salary information to be among categories of information protected as trade secret when en......
-
Chapter § 9-2 The Twelve Elements in Drafting a Noncompete
...what I call a "proportionate restriction." A useful case on confidential information is Gallagher Healthcare Ins. Servs. v. Vogelsang, 312 S.W.3d 640, 643-44 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied). This is what the agreement said: The executive recognizes that by virtue of her em......