Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.

Decision Date04 February 1914
Citation138 P. 267,77 Wash. 655
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesGANNAWAY et ux. v. PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT & POWER CO.

Department 2. Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Mitchell Gilliam Judge.

Action by C. R. Gannaway and wife against the Puget Sound Traction Light & Power Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions to dismiss action.

Jas. B. Howe and A. J. Falknor, both of Seattle, for appellant.

Reynolds, Ballinger & Hutson, of Seattle, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant owns and operates a street railway system in the city of Seattle. One of its lines, known as the Fauntleroy Park line, passes for a part of the way north along Twenty-Eighth Avenue Southwest to its junction with Andover street, where it turns to the right and passes on its way over that street. The track is laid to the left of the center of the streets. The street known as Twenty-Eighth Avenue Southwest is paved with planking for its full width on the right or east of the car tracks from its junction with Andover street for some distance south. There is no paving of any kind between the tracks, nor on the street to the left or west thereof. The cars operated over this line are of a large doubletrucked type, having a front and rear exit opening on the right of the car. Passengers traveling north over Twenty-Eighth Avenue Southwest, and desiring to alight at its junction with Andover street, are of necessity let out onto the east side of the track onto the planked way of the street. Those coming from the opposite direction must be let out on the other side, and for their accommodation, and for the accommodation of those desiring to take cars going in that direction, the appellant constructed a platform some five feet wide, extending south on Twenty-Eighth Avenue Southwest from its junction with Andover street for a distance of 30 feet. On the evening of April 29, 1912, the respondents, with some eight others, took passage on one of the appellant's cars at points south of junction of the streets named; their designation being such junction. When the car reached the junction it stopped at its usual stopping place to the right of the platform mentioned, and the party alighted from the rear exit onto the planked roadway to the right of the car, and on its opposite side from the platform. The party immediately passed to the rear of the car, crossed the car tracks, stepped upon the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1939
    ... ... to yield the right-of-way to plaintiff; (2) Failing to sound ... a horn; (3) Failing to give plaintiff warning in any manner ... any doubt that it was wholly within the power of the ... deceased at any moment before the collision to have averted ... Co. , 147 Wis. 668, 134 N.W. 144." ... In ... Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & P ... Co. , 77 Wash. 655, 138 P. 267, ... ...
  • Zalewski v. Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1935
    ...115 Cal.App. 709, 2 P. (2d) 468, 470;French v. Princeton Power Co., 95 W.Va. 707, 122 S.E. 171, 172;Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co., 77 Wash. 655, 657, 138 P. 267;Wheeler v. Des Moines City R. Co., 205 Iowa, 439, 215 N.W. 950, 55 A.L.R. 473;Matulewicz v. Metropolitan St.......
  • Welsh v. Spokane & I. E. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • May 20, 1916
    ... ... Railroads, page 449; Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction L ... & P. Co., 77 ... The language above quoted was used in the light of ... the facts there involved. With full ... power, in order that she might alight from the car in ... ...
  • Hering v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1928
    ...to discharge his duty of lookout ahead, and to operate his car in the manner generally recognized as careful. Gannaway v. Puget Sound T. L. & P. Co., 77 Wash. 655, 138 P. 267;Matulewicz v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 107 App. Div. 230, 95 N. Y. S. 7;Jelly v. North Jersey Street R. Co., 76 N......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT