Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. Comm'r of Labor (In re Clifford)
| Decision Date | 12 December 2019 |
| Docket Number | 526990 |
| Citation | 178 A.D.3d 1213,115 N.Y.S.3d 525 |
| Parties | In the MATTER OF the Claim of David CLIFFORD, Respondent. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., Doing Business as Press & Sun-Bulletin, Appellant. v. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (L. Michael Zinser of The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee, admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.
Teresa C. Mulliken, Harpersfield, for David Clifford, respondent.
Before: Clark, J.P., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ.
Devine, J. Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 17, 2018, which ruled, among other things, that Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.
Claimant entered into two written agreements with Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. to distribute a particular newspaper and other publications within certain geographic areas. After claimant's services were terminated due to customer complaints, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Department of Labor concluded that claimant was an employee of Gannett and, hence, was eligible to receive such benefits and further found that Gannett was liable for additional contributions based upon remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated. Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge upheld the initial determinations, and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed. These appeals by Gannett ensued.
We affirm. "Whether an employment relationship exists within the meaning of the unemployment insurance law is a question of fact, no one factor is determinative and the determination of the ... [B]oard, if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, is beyond further judicial review even though there is evidence in the record that would have supported a contrary conclusion" ( Matter of Fecca [Herald Publ. Co.-Commissioner of Labor] , 171 A.D.3d 1423, 1424, 99 N.Y.S.3d 110 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Isaacs [Speedy Media Assoc., LLC–Commissioner of Labor] , 125 A.D.3d 1077, 1078, 3 N.Y.S.3d 776 [2015] ). Although Gannett details the various factors that would support a finding that claimant was an independent contractor, our review of the agreements executed by claimant, which are virtually identical to the contract at issue in Matter of Smith (Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor ), 166 A.D.3d 1251, 85 N.Y.S.3d 796 (2018), reveals that the indicia of control retained by Gannett supports the Board's finding of an employment relationship.
Claimant was assigned delivery routes within a defined area, was required to deliver the newspapers by a certain time and was paid at a specified per-paper rate (see Matter of Fecca [Herald Publ. Co.-Commissioner of Labor] , 171 A.D.3d at 1425–1426, 99 N.Y.S.3d 110 ; Matter of Alemic [Herald Publ. Co.-Commissioner of Labor] , 140 A.D.3d 1565, 1566, 34 N.Y.S.3d 711 [2016] ). Additionally, claimant was required to provide proof of a valid driver's license and insurance, was offered (and declined) additional accident coverage provided by a carrier utilized by Gannett and was precluded from placing any inserts or additional materials in the newspapers that he was delivering (see Matter of Hennessy [Hearst Corp.-Commissioner of Labor] , 172 A.D.3d 1842, 1843, 102 N.Y.S.3d 310 [2019], appeal dismissed 34 N.Y.3d 943, 110 N.Y.S.3d 396, 134 N.E.3d 137 [2019] ; Matter of Rosenfelder [Community First Holdings, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor] , 137 A.D.3d 1438, 1440, 28 N.Y.S.3d 137 [2016] ). Finally, one of the two agreements signed by claimant reflects that he elected to purchase a tablet from...
To continue reading
Request your trial